Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #560035

Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 12:38:40 AM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> On 27/02/2016 4:35 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>> > https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/atmospheric-convection-what-does-it-mean/comment-page-7/#comment-114096
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Will: My point is that no one or group has the slightest clue as to
>> > how this atmosphere may work. Any claim of such must be an attempt at
>> > deliberate scam!
>> >
>> > James: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled.  Expansiveness
>> > and buoyancy play no role.  Kinetic energy running along distinct
>> > boundaries at the top of the troposphere create the flows--jet
>> > streams--that create the LOW PRESSURE that pulls the rest of the
>> > atmosphere along.  Moisture in the atmosphere facilitates the kinetic
>> > energy and provides the leverage by which the upper atmosphere
>> > maintains its grip on the lower atmosphere through storms.
>> >
>> > One simple observation that proves I'm right and the convection model
>> > is wrong: The fact that storms and low pressure are correlated.
>> > Specifically, if the convection model was correct then storms would
>> > have to be correlated with high pressure.  Bu they aren't.  As
>> > predicted by my model storms are associated with low pressure.
>> >
>> 
>> On a molecular level, how does pulling work in a gas?
>> 
>> Sylvia.
> 
> This is one of the smartest questions I've been asked.  My answer
> involves flat boundary layers between moist air and dry air, like
> those that form naturally along the tropopause; it involves energy
> acccumulating in a stream; it involves plasma; it involve spinning;
> it involves high wind speeds; it involves Bernoulli effect; it involves
> long distances; it involve differential pressure as the energy source . . .
> and more:

And mostly it involves magic.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 09:35 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 10:14 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:07 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:24 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:26 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:38 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 17:02 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 18:06 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:34 -0600
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:11 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:22 -0600
        Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 11:26 -0800
          Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:29 -0600
            Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:00 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:04 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:06 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:17 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:01 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:24 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:42 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 18:33 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-27 03:52 +0000
                pull or\and push it noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 16:58 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 16:03 -0800
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:05 -0600
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 12:13 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 14:16 -0600
              Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 20:52 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 13:05 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:02 +0000
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 15:25 -0800
                Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 23:47 +0000
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-26 13:03 -0600
  is pulled by noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:46 -0800
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 09:41 -0800
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 11:47 -0600
  Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-07 19:38 +1100
    Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 01:01 -0800
      Re: Atmospheric flow isn't pushed, it is pulled jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-07 18:13 +0000

csiph-web