Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #318616
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: A challenge for the "advocates" |
| Date | 2015-09-02 15:29 +0000 |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Message-ID | <fsmnvc9.kdfi@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ms6r89$k73$2@dont-email.me> <ms71du$g74$2@dont-email.me> <D20C58BE.59B15%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <fsmd93.idfo@rooftop.invalid> <D20C5EEB.59B30%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/2/15, 8:01 AM, in article fsmd93.idfo@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/2/15, 7:36 AM, in article ms71du$g74$2@dont-email.me, "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> >>> wrote: >> >>>> On 2015-09-02 8:49 AM, ronb wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 08:20:43 +0000, vallor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Of course, that's part of the guy's MO: act in an offensive manner, >>>>>> then claim that he just wants to "talk about technology". It's a "gag" >>>>>> that is so old that it pees rust, farts dust, and gives powdered milk. >>>>> >>>>> I hate to say this, but as much as I like your (and Peter's) posts, I'm >>>>> about ready to put both of you in the killfile for a month. I'm sick of >>>>> reading "Snit's" constant horseshit, even second hand. >>>> >>>> Oh, the HUMANITY! How will Vallor the Hutt and Peter the Klöwn survive a >>>> month in your killfile? >>>> >>> Really comes down to I challenged the "advocates" to see if their tool with >>> so much "choice" could do a few tasks I find easy to do elsewhere. >> >>> And they ran off screaming and leaving insults in their wake. >> >>> The only even close attempt has been from Owl who has to make system wide >>> scripts tied to system wide hot keys to even attempt to look like he can do >>> these things in a streamlined way. >> >> Much more streamlined than the System Wide Print Dialog on OSuX. > Again: you need to make system wide hotkeys tied to scripts to try to > emulate what I do WITHOUT such scripting made just to try to "win". > Show your scripts. Show making them. No. No more source code. You have a UNIX system. Learn how to use it. > Your workflow is a LOT more time consuming. No it's not. It's much more streamlined. >>> But then he leaves out the part of creating the script! He ignores that the >>> workflow he uses involves a *LOT* more than what he shows on screen, and >>> that to do it he needs to use multiple VMs so he can avoid getting his menus >>> cluttered and having too many hot keys to remember. >> >> Lying dumbass. I used multipe VMs because the task switched to one >> involving email, and I needed a way to demonstrated that while maintaining >> anonymity; so I took the work from my host system to a virtual network. > I already gave you a list of the tasks you would have to script... came to > dozens. Most of that crap could be part of a case statement in a single script. > Then you lied and said these would all be in OS X's print dialog. Nope. They > are where you want them - in context. No they're not. You have a "Save to Recipes Folder" menu that will show up in a spreadsheet's view of the System Print Dialog. LOL. > You can set most to hot keys (maybe > all?) but no need to. And no need for a million icons in a launcher. You can do whatever you like on Linux. It's OSuX that is limiting.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 14:08 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-01 23:42 +0200
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:32 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 08:20 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 04:52 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:49 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-02 08:04 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-02 10:36 -0400
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:01 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 15:29 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 08:48 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:49 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 17:38 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-02 21:58 -0600
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-02 19:41 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" ronb <ronbNOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 23:41 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-03 09:27 -0400
Snit! Give it up, YOU degenerate. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 14:43 -0700
Re: Snit! Give it up, YOU degenerate. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-09-01 23:55 +0000
Re: Snit! Give it up, YOU degenerate. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 18:44 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 14:57 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 22:39 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-01 23:10 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 15:52 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-01 18:02 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-02 08:13 +0200
Re: Another Snit Circus attempt. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-02 04:50 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-02 14:56 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 00:26 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 07:33 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 00:44 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:51 +0000
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:01 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:03 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:52 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:23 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-04 11:19 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:47 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-04 11:15 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-04 09:49 -0700
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:08 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:54 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:54 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:23 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-04 21:06 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 00:57 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 01:56 -0500
Re: A challenge for the "advocates" Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-05 02:24 -0500
csiph-web