Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #604041
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Simple Probability Question |
| Date | 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <fp97fd-okm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nvnbfc$6ai$1@dont-email.me> <nvq5dh$3qe$3@gioia.aioe.org> <nvqskf$1m4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 11/7/2016 9:08 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 11/6/2016 7:34 AM, Bob wrote: >>> Each coins gets and experiences the exact same input. >>> 100 % identical. >> >> Can't do that. Violates laws of physics. >> > > yup. they cannot weigh the same, if real coins, there is at least a 5% > variance. > > > I weighed 50 aspirins once, 325mg, however each one did not weigh 325mg, > they were all off, but within +-30mg. > > > ALSO, if it is a coin, it has been stamped on both sides, with different > impressions, therefore the center of gravity is NOT exactly in the > middle of the coin, creating a bias. You people need to decide whether you're talking about real coins out of pocket or 'special' experimental, controlled coins made for the purpose of the experiment. FYI the front to back resistration on real coin is pretty consistant, so any bias should be the same for a given lot of real coins. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simple Probability Question Bob <rgsros@notme.invalid> - 2016-11-06 08:34 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 14:50 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-11-06 10:37 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:47 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-11-06 17:44 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 12:50 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 20:04 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 14:51 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:24 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:24 -0800
Re: Simple Probability Question "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:08 -0800
Re: Simple Probability Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:08 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 18:42 +0000
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 15:44 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000
Re: Simple Probability Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:20 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-08 12:13 -0600
csiph-web