Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #604041

Re: Simple Probability Question

From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Simple Probability Question
Date 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <fp97fd-okm.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <nvnbfc$6ai$1@dont-email.me> <nvq5dh$3qe$3@gioia.aioe.org> <nvqskf$1m4$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 9:08 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 11/6/2016 7:34 AM, Bob wrote:
>>> Each coins gets and experiences the exact same input.
>>> 100 % identical.
>>
>> Can't do that. Violates laws of physics.
>>
> 
> yup.  they cannot weigh the same, if real coins, there is at least a 5% 
> variance.
> 
> 
> I weighed 50 aspirins once, 325mg, however each one did not weigh 325mg, 
> they were all off, but within +-30mg.
> 
> 
> ALSO, if it is a coin, it has been stamped on both sides, with different 
> impressions, therefore the center of gravity is NOT exactly in the 
> middle of the coin, creating a bias.

You people need to decide whether you're talking about real coins out
of pocket or 'special' experimental, controlled coins made for the
purpose of the experiment.

FYI the front to back resistration on real coin is pretty consistant,
so any bias should be the same for a given lot of real coins.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Simple Probability Question Bob <rgsros@notme.invalid> - 2016-11-06 08:34 -0500
  Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 14:50 +0100
    Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100
    Re: Simple Probability Question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-11-06 10:37 -0500
      Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:47 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-11-06 17:44 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 12:50 -0600
    Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 20:04 +0100
      Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 14:51 -0600
        Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:24 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:24 -0800
    Re: Simple Probability Question "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:08 -0800
  Re: Simple Probability Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:08 -0600
    Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 18:42 +0000
    Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 15:44 -0600
      Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000
        Re: Simple Probability Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:20 -0500
          Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-08 12:13 -0600

csiph-web