Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #15187

Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you?

Show all headers | View raw

goran.pusic@gmail.com writes:
>On Monday, April 2, 2012 1:16:30 PM UTC+2, Qi wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Let me show some code first,
>> 
>> void someFunction(int param)
>> {
>>     (void)param; // param is not used in this function. This line is
>> // just to silence the compiler warning about unused param.
>> }
>> 
>> Please note the "(void)param".
>> Is that usage common or well known for you?
>> Or you rarely saw it? Or even it's weird to you?
>
>Seen it. Also seen macros, coming from Microsoft, that use this trick and distinguish between NDEBUG and _DEBUG builds.

When using g++, you may use __attribute__((unused))

int
main(int argc __attribute__((unused)), const char **argv __attribute__((unused)))
{

  return 0;
}

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 19:16 +0800
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2012-04-02 13:39 +0200
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-04-02 09:49 -0400
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 22:01 +0800
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-04-02 11:50 -0400
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2012-04-02 12:54 -0700
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 05:27 +0000
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-04-03 08:02 +0000
          Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 14:19 +0000
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Mike McCarty <mcmccarty@gmail.com> - 2012-04-02 06:43 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? GM <GM@no.spam.it> - 2012-04-02 14:41 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-04-02 16:55 +0200
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 05:28 +0000
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 13:54 +0800
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-03 14:09 +0000
          Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-03 11:21 -0500
            Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-04-04 17:39 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-04-02 15:13 +0000
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-02 11:37 -0500
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 10:29 +0800
      Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-04-03 06:00 +0200
        Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-03 13:56 +0800
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? goran.pusic@gmail.com - 2012-04-02 04:25 -0700
    Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-04-02 22:01 +0000
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2012-04-02 07:37 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2012-04-03 19:35 +0200
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-04-04 11:56 -0700
  Re: Need your experience: is "(void)param;" to avoid unused variable warnings well known for you? Qi <no@no.no> - 2012-04-05 14:17 +0800

csiph-web