Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354699
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat |
| Date | 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <fhtmkgi4.ko9df@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <mr-023a8fa28c27fb838e203d67a3af39c9@individual.net> |
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> The problem with using so many sock puppets is that you have to
> remember who you're posting as, this has been a common thing with
> Snit, where he accidentally posts a sock puppet post with his Snit
> handle, or posts a Snit post with a sock puppet handle. This last
> mistake was with the sock puppet "meat". Now, to be perfectly honest,
> this particular sock puppet had me fooled. Not that I had given it
> much thought really, but people started to call it a sock puppet of
> Snit and I went "really?" because the thing with "meat" was that he
> didn't post derogatory stuff directed towards Steve Carroll (or other
> "enemies" of Snit).
>
> Anyway, "meat" posted this:
> <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
>
> Which was a post using the "meat" account but content from Snit,
> talking about things as Snit, with Snit's usual signature. Snit
> quickly cancelled that post and reposted it verbatim using his real
> Snit account and settings:
>
> <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>
> So, since he cancelled it, the first post may not appear on all news
> servers out there, but it obviously did on mine (and many others) and
> you can read it here:
> http://usenet.sandman.net/reader/index/read?id=494156 or here on
> Google:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/FlMv-Vb8a7c/euDjS0RdNAAJ
>
> And the reposted "Snit" version is here:
> http://usenet.sandman.net/reader/index/read?id=494154 and on Google:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/FlMv-Vb8a7c/2sxKchBdNAAJ
>
What was cancelled? The Snit has a lower article number on my server
than the meat post (which has not been cancelled), meaning the Snit
post arrived *before* the meat post. The meat post has a date 17
seconds after the Snit post. Whether it was scripted or was a rapid
cut/paste job, the meat post came later.
group comp.os.linux.advocacy
211 85148 2155087 2240234 comp.os.linux.advocacy
xpat message-id 2155087-2240234 <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
221 message-id matches follow (NOV)
2239839 <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
.
xpat message-id 2155087-2240234 <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
221 message-id matches follow (NOV)
2239841 <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
.
xpat date 2239839 *
221 date matches follow (NOV)
2239839 Mon, 09 May 2016 14:46:37 -0700
.
xpat date 2239841 *
221 date matches follow (NOV)
2239841 Mon, 9 May 2016 21:46:54 -0000 (UTC)
.
anon@lowtide:~$ date -u -d "Mon, 09 May 2016 14:46:37 -0700"
Mon May 9 21:46:37 UTC 2016
anon@lowtide:~$ date -u -d "Mon, 9 May 2016 21:46:54 -0000 (UTC)"
Mon May 9 21:46:54 UTC 2016
anon@lowtide:~$ echo "54-37" |bc
17
anon@lowtide:~$
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-11 22:57 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-12 13:27 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 08:48 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 06:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-12 21:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 23:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-13 08:52 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:12 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 15:38 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:50 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:06 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:26 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:34 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 18:38 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 20:07 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:04 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 21:35 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 19:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 23:37 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:24 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700
Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000
Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:36 -0700
Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:02 +0000
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-05-16 13:57 +0100
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700
csiph-web