Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #351022

Re: LOL underestimated

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: LOL underestimated
Date 2016-04-20 17:34 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <fhjgda03.af3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References <fjgu003af.p4e@rooftop.invalid> <20160420191915.3cf2c768@maxa-pc>

Show all headers | View raw

Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:10:00 +0000 (UTC)
> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Underestimated the time it would take.  Probably about 90 days at this
>> rate.  LOL.  Restarted the 200GB file write after starting a series of
>> attacks on the problem space for a particular match.
>> 
>> https://vid.me/9qwp
>> 
>> They've been running all night and only about half way to flipping the
>> first digit on the left part.  It needs to flip 32 times before it's
>> done. This is when you appreciate Linux uptime and X11 virtual
>> desktops.
>> 
> 
> What are you trying to do?

At least some eternal-september posts have an Injection-Info
header, part of which consists of a "posting-host" string that
appears to be an md5 hash.  I'm working on the assumption
that it is a direct hash of a dotted quad IP address (could
very well a bogus assumption).

So, I am creating an md5 lookup table for all IPv4 addresses.
That will take several months to create what will be about
200GB file in the format I'm using:

anon@lowtide:~$ head /media/anon/5331134e-f853-4f49-876b-863d26af6261/out
1.1.1.1
a56bdbb2cc577c3eb01b8575c9241d51  -
1.1.1.2
d79e1566ae16cc3ab5060b74df13c9a4  -
1.1.1.3
117786110e867993f7d584b6097f2203  -
1.1.1.4
254e7213914e76fa50811e5fd46e5dc5  -
1.1.1.5
954b258b29028c2c250ecd3dd7b0c5da  -

progress far (since last night):

anon@lowtide:~$ tail /media/anon/5331134e-f853-4f49-876b-863d26af6261/out
1.173.19.22
0986c814c63feea0933437ef5de7a6a8  -
1.173.19.23
fb59ae6da90786e4d0ae256bdf6703b0  -
1.173.19.24
216a58bb2825f4c4cdeaf4e3c6fddce7  -
1.173.19.25
87fe5a2b16d563265e9ec881994533c5  -
1.173.19.26
924e64c48cadbe4133c646f698eca4a2  -
anon@lowtide:~$

I'm simultaneously running an attack on a particular hash over the entire
address space (those eight small windows in the vid).

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 15:10 +0000
  Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 16:55 +0000
    Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 17:25 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 18:45 +0000
        Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 18:47 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:05 +0000
            Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-25 19:07 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 21:16 +0000
        Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 20:51 +0200
  Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 19:19 +0200
    Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 17:34 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 20:31 +0200
        Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:13 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:20 +0200
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:29 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-20 14:33 -0700
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:58 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:04 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:25 +0200
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:41 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-20 23:50 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:06 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-21 08:54 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 17:12 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:50 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-20 23:51 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:59 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:10 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 00:11 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:19 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 00:57 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 00:07 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 23:17 -0400
        Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 03:49 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 10:27 -0400
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 16:26 +0000

csiph-web