Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6778
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| References | <c4891256-0c18-4eab-a227-ba819263d133@v11g2000prk.googlegroups.com> |
| Subject | Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences |
| Message-ID | <fgiKp.1272$tp.587@newsfe06.iad> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-06-16 00:28 -0700 |
"Joshua Maurice" <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> wrote in message news:c4891256-0c18-4eab-a227-ba819263d133@v11g2000prk.googlegroups.com... > Ok. This is coming from a recent thread in comp.programming.threads, > talking about C++0x. (You don't need to review it. I'll provide the > relevant context here.) > > "questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence" > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.programming.threads/browse_thread/thread/0158f1f2bca1019e# > > Consider the following code. [...] > Q1. First, am I right in concluding that in the above code, all of the > loads and stores might as well be memory_order_relaxed, right? I think you are correct. > Q2. Second, is the following end condition possible? > r1 == 0 && r2 == 1 && r3 == 0 FWIW, Relacy Race Detector says that the condition is indeed possible; here is a test case: http://pastebin.com/G4yDLyRy [...]
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-06-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 00:28 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 00:41 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 02:47 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 11:45 +0100
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-06-16 14:32 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 09:42 +0100
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 02:50 -0700
Re: Threading question - read-read coherency almost, sort of, with seq_cst fences Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-06-16 02:53 -0700
csiph-web