Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #156579
| From | Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? |
| Date | 2016-01-13 08:37 +0100 |
| Organization | Me, Myself and I |
| Message-ID | <febhmc-k5b.ln1@sambook.reistad.name> (permalink) |
| References | <be792ee4-dda9-413c-a9c3-e6ad71b9fa47@googlegroups.com> <353e6d8e-eab6-46f1-b579-8ee24379f6e0@googlegroups.com> <16b10215-5707-4848-b9dc-74ff48b76b9a@googlegroups.com> |
In article <16b10215-5707-4848-b9dc-74ff48b76b9a@googlegroups.com>, <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: >On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 6:59:37 PM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: > >> The price cut was basically a fit of pique by Watson. > >Thanks for your comments. > >That was my feeling, and what prompted me to introduce the discussion >to see what others thought. > >Managers don't like to be surprised with bad news out of the blue. >They throw temper tantrums. > >From the IBM history, my impression was that the Stretch designers >were working with many experimental pieces, for which the actual >performance would not be known until everything was done and put >together. The new transistors were fast, but not as fast as expected. >The parallel processing was fast, but not as fast as expected. > >Because it was an experimental system, it seemed Watson's anger >at Dunwell wasn't justified. Watson finally realized that a >few years later. The strategy of IBM in the 360 and early 370 era seems to be one of shotgun aiming at the market; run a lot of different products, and let the customers respond as they would. This way they had a lot of successes and some failures. This goes with the territory of such broad aims. I don't think anyone could have predicted which models would sell and which wouldn't 5 years ahead of the launch, 8 years prior to settlement of success/failure. This approach was made possible by having a line of program and (mostly) peripherals compatibility. -- mrr
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-12 09:37 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-12 15:59 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-12 16:01 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-12 18:50 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-12 23:37 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-13 07:24 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-13 14:37 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-13 08:37 +0100
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-13 07:39 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-01-13 08:17 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-13 18:02 -0600
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-13 12:58 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-13 13:53 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-01-13 14:31 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-13 18:38 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-13 22:43 +0000
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 20:13 -0500
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-13 17:17 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-13 18:32 -0800
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 21:51 -0500
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-14 18:24 +0000
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 20:04 -0500
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 08:03 -0500
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-13 17:49 -0600
Re: IBM STRETCH repricing decision? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-14 08:03 -0500
csiph-web