Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| References | <kcngpa$2jl$1@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple |
| Message-ID | <f7IHs.6$wT7.5@fx02.fr7> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2013-01-10 23:26 +0000 |
"Shao Miller" <sha0.miller@gmail.com> wrote in message news:kcngpa$2jl$1@dont-email.me... > Suppose you have a function 'bar' that returns a value that means one of: > - Do 'foo' zero times > - Do 'foo' one time > - Do 'foo' more than one time > > What's your favourite way of handling such a value? Obvious return values would be (0, 1, 2), or (0, N) (or just N) if the actual number of times is being specified. -- bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 17:53 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-10 23:26 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-10 18:49 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-11 00:23 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-01-11 03:20 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 00:38 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Bart van Ingen Schenau <bart@ingen.ddns.info.invalid> - 2013-01-11 12:10 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 13:37 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 13:56 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Fred K <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 11:15 -0800
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 14:28 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Greg Martin <greg@softsprocket.com> - 2013-01-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-11 15:23 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Greg Martin <greg@softsprocket.com> - 2013-01-11 13:09 -0800
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-11 22:09 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2013-01-12 04:49 -0800
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-13 20:30 -0500
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-01-11 21:02 +0000
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-01-13 20:28 +0200
Re: Favourite Pattern for Processing Zero, Once, Multiple Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-13 16:12 -0500
csiph-web