Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #653396

Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Brain), in
<news:h9ioebpuc3bped06tbq3n26b75dtpj6l2a@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:

>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.yeidzpcatm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> i almost forgot!  http://i.imgur.com/oxQpm8x.png

>> Bwahahahaaa! DildoRider yet again demonstrates why he is known as
>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron.

> Looks like part of fakey's 6-sine mishmash!

>>> fakey, what's the electronegativity of oxygen?

>> Archived, so you can't backpedal away from your stupidity, DildoRider.

> Uh oh... fakey runs from that question faster than a
> werewolf fleeing the crack of dawn.

I've already provided the answer, from someone far smarter and saner
than you, Shiny Tinfoil Brain. Your inability to understand that
correct answer given, compelling you to bleat out repeatedly that you
demand an answer in cartoon form that you can understand, is no one's
fault but your own.

Now, on to sinewaves...

<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
<http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
=====================================================
Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line 
currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical 
components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal 
components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to 
polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called 
algebraic *vector* *addition*.
=====================================================

And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the 
Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity 
properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and 
wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and 
that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for 
standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on 
this topic...

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
"Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition 
is interpreted as a vector sum."

There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.

Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits 
will hopefully understand...

<http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>

Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
Blue: Red + Green

See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's 
50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum 
two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two 
tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.

Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third 
phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always 
equal zero.

Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...

<http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>

Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show 
the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple 
line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave 
subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the 
superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the 
Red and the Green lines.

In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line 
has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87 
volts.

Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result 
when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh... 
that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at 
that point on the X axis.

Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave 
subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?

But wait! It gets even better!

<http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>

That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.

And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
into either 173 *or* -173 volts!

Because you're both Mathematical Morons.

SPNAK!

<dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably 
proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge 
fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Brain have been 
*wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.

Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your 
moronic asses across Usenet.

I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...

SPNAK!

> -- 
> "..the term 'electronegativity' denotes a *positive* nucleal
> charge."  --Fakey the Chemist waxes stupid

<http://www.chem1.com/acad/webtext/chembond/cb04.html>
"The electronegativity of an atom denotes its relative
electron-attracting power in a chemical bond."

You know, electrons... *negative* *charge*. Moron.

Careful, Shiny Tinfoil Brain, there's *vector* *summation* on that web
page, so it's going to confuse the hell out of you.

SPNAK!

Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Brain? LOL

I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.

<snicker>

-- 

Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know:
=====================================
MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com>
MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier
Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which
should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create
*sinusoids*).

That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms.

That superposition is the same as wave interference.

That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves.

That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things.

That RMS isn't a DC voltage.

That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207
volts RMS L-L.

That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1.

The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave.

That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering.

What a positive or negative vector is.

That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero.

That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic".

That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2
positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron.

That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective
nuclear charge.

What the definition of the word "equivalent" is.

That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples.

That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the
atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842%
margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F.

That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of
a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does
*not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames.

That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes
into account molar volume.

That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error".

That water can be plasmized.

That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge.

And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph.
=====================================

SPNAK!

<snicker>

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

sin (x) + sin (x + 180) binky feel good <waldbyfjulian@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-16 21:09 -0700
  Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 01:13 -0400
  Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Chicken F*cker DOW #4 <willaim.jillians649@btinternet.com> - 2016-03-17 06:33 +0000
    Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-17 16:24 +0100
      Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-17 13:07 -0400
        Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 06:04 +0100
          Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 01:30 -0400
            Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-18 03:05 -0400
              Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 02:34 +0800
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-18 19:18 +0000
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 05:04 +0100
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-19 07:41 +0000
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 19:07 +0100
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 04:38 +0100
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-19 16:47 +0800
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-19 19:17 +0100
                Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-19 18:34 +0000
            Re: sin (x) + sin (x + 180) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-18 17:56 +0100

csiph-web