Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.usenet.kooks > #650286

Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
<news:742f9100-96cb-4b62-8b89-159df4e1b748@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 8:55:48 AM UTC-8,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> See my paper for details and a conceptual understanding of the
>>> molecular dynamics that explain why you have the wrong idea on
>>> this notion--a notion that was popularized by Feynman.

>> You're wrong, Jim. You don't even know what translational kinetic
>> energy is, you've made that apparent. And I destroyed the entire
>> underlying premise for your kook theory above. Now what will  you do,
>> Jim?

> It's regrettable you can't prove it.

The only regrettable thing is that you're suffering from
Dunning-Kruger so badly that you've snipped out all that proof and run
away from it, whilst offering absolutely no refutation of my having
utterly destroyed your kooky little theory, Jim. Because you can't.
Because you're wrong. And you know it. Which is *why* you snipped out
all that proof of your being wrong.

You'll be forwarding that $100,000 to me, Jim. Not only did I meet and
exceed one of your 'Or' condition, I met and exceeded all of them,
then went on to destroy the central premise of your entire kooky
theory.

This doesn't end until you pay, Jim. Can you spare the years it'll
take to continually run away from the fact that you're a delusional
kook, Jim? Can you spare the bad reputation you'll get, being known as
a reality-denying delusional moron in spite of having your stupid face
rubbed in a mountain of evidence that you're a reality-denying
delusional moron?

<snicker>

>>> Don't assume that because it is invisible that it is gaseous.

>> I know that

> Do you?  Why does it seem like you don't?

Sure I do. You're the one cowardly snipping out all the proof that
you're a delusional kooktard, Jim. That scientific proof also happens
to *dis*prove your kooky theory *and* prove that you're a moron who
cannot grasp simple physical processes, Jim. Why are you so stupid and
delusional, Jim?

>> because the surface molecules have their acceptor
>> electrons sticking out from the surface, giving a net negative surface
>> potential, whereas air has a net positive electric potential,

> It's their acceptor hydrogen atoms (not electrons), giving surface a
> net positive charge.  The atmosphere has a net negative charge. 

FFS, you moron, you've got it exactly backwards.

<http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/interfacial_water.html>
"About a quarter of the water molecules each have a 'dangling' O-H
group [415, 1613] pointing at a slight angle out of the water [594,
1261] whilst slightly more have 'dangling' acceptor electron positions
[2334] similar to water-hydrophobe surfaces, creating a slight
negative charge on the surface."

What's that say, you moron? Just how do you think evaporation occurs
in the first place? The surface potential of water is negative. The
electric potential of air is positive. This, combined with random
thermal vibrations in the bulk water, causes individual water
molecules to be electrically attached to the air. Reference Feynman
Lectures on Physics, Electricity In The Atmosphere, 1964.

<http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_09.html>
<http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/img/FLP_II/f09-01/f09-01_tc_iPad_big_a.svgz>

You're wrong, Jim. Your entire kooky theory is wrong, Jim. I've
destroyed the central premise of your kooky theory, thereby proving
that both you *and* your kooky theory are wrong, Jim.

That'd be because you're an uneducated moron suffering from delusions,
combined with Dunning-Kruger causing you to believe you can never be
wrong. Take your meds, Jim.

>> that evaporation is a molecule-by-molecule process, Jim.

> Impossible.  Full polarity of singular H2O molecules is too high..

That makes absolutely no sense, Jim. If polarity were higher,
evaporation would occur at an even faster rate. We're not talking
about "singular H2O molecules", Jim, we're talking about bulk water,
with those acceptor sites filled by H bonds.

Why are you so stupid, Jim? People far smarter than you have figured
all this out long before you conceived of your kooky discredited
theory, Jim.

Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research
<http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/molecular_mechanism_of_water_evaporation>
=================================================
A water molecule is typically tied to three or four other molecules in
the liquid through strong hydrogen bonds. At the surface, this number
is reduced, and in order to evaporate the molecule must break at least
one hydrogen bond. However, this requires substantial energy, and the
obvious question is: "How do evaporating water molecules gain
sufficient energy to break the strong hydrogen bond?" To answer this,
the researchers watched molecules evaporate in their molecular movies,
and inspected the evaporating molecules' trajectories. They found that
an ejected molecule always gains its kinetic energy through a precise
interaction with two other molecules. It always had a violent
collision with a fast-moving molecule just prior to leaving the
liquid. This fast-moving molecule, further study showed, was
interacting strongly with a third molecule, femtoseconds prior to the
evaporation process, in a way that was crucial to the evaporation
process. As such, the evaporation process can be viewed as a Newton's
cradle, where momentum is transferred to the surface from below, in a
well-timed manner, to kick off one water molecule.
=================================================

"one water molecule", Jim. Evaporation is a molecule-by-molecule
process, meaning that water in its gaseous phase is entering the
atmosphere, meaning water in its gaseous phase is in the atmosphere,
meaning your kooky challenge has been met and the proof has been
provided, meaning the underlying premise of your kooky theory has been
utterly destroyed, meaning you  owe me $100,000, Jim. You *will* pay,
Jim.

<snicker>

>> I know that because the surface molecules have their acceptor
>> electrons sticking out from the surface, giving a net negative surface
>> potential, whereas air has a net positive electric potential, that
>> evaporation is a molecule-by-molecule process, Jim. I proved it above.
>> You're the kooktard who k'lames that entire clumps of water are
>> jumping off the surface of the water. Your kooky theory has been
>> proven wrong, Jim.

> You proved shit.

I proved it, Jim. You're wrong, Jim. Your entire kooky theory is
wrong, Jim. Now you're faced with the choice of embracing the reality
that your kooky theory has been utterly destroyed, or continuing to
grow your insanity by denying reality. Those are the only two choices
you've been given, Jim. And we all know which you'll choose, because
Dunning-Kruger sufferers always choose to deny reality until their
lives are destroyed, Jim. I've seen it enough times to know you'll do
the same.

>> you don't know the difference between bond angle and symmetry 

> You lost me.

Exactly. Because you're a low-information moron who can't grasp
reality, Jim.

>> you don't know that the inter-molecular H
>> bond gets *weaker* when one of them is broken due to the much stronger
>> covalent bonds shortening; 

> Are you saying you do know this?  How?  

Because I've proved it with third-party corroborable proof from
researchers far smarter and saner than you, Jim. You snipped it out
because it utterly destroys the central tenet of your kooky theory.

>> you don't know what translational kinetic
>> energy is; and you have no idea of how evaporation actually works, nor
>> that it's a molecule-by-molecule process.

> So, you have this sophisticated theory, but no evidence to back it up.  Right?  

The peer-reviewed proof was presented, which you cowardly snipped out,
Jim. Do you believe that denying reality, backpedaling, cowardly
snipping and attempting to non sequitur your way through your ordeal,
as you present absolutely zero proof of your own, is a good way of
pulling through your nightmare unscathed, Jim?

>>> The energy of storms does not come from below, comes from above.

>> How is that possible, Jim, given that energy cannot flow from cooler
>> to warmer? Are you going to deny the Laws of Thermodynamics now, Jim?

> It' kinetic energy, dumbass.

So you *are* going to deny the Laws of Thermodynamics, then. That's
not very sane of you, now is it, Jim?

>>> And it does come from heat expansion, it comes from low pressure,
>>> bernoulli effect.

>> No, Jim. The rolling starts with horizontal shearing between cold and
>> warm air masses. That rolling turns vertical, and when it reaches the
>> ground, the warm moist air feeds the funnel

> What is the funnel made of?  What is it's molecular composition?  

It's air and condensation, you fecking nong. WTF? Are you retarded,
Jim?

>>> Can you explain the dynamics of a heat engine pushing the jet
>>> stream into existence?

>> The same underlying cause which you fail to grasp for why a warmer or
>> wetter layer of air can sit below a cooler or dryer layer of air
>> despite it having a higher molar volume than the air above it if both
>> were at the same altitude... air density due to altitude.

> Vague.

Not vague, Jim. Just not understandable to morons like you. Why can't
you understand air density due to altitude, Jim? Are you stupid, or
just uneducated? Which grade school level did you complete, Jim?

Do you deny that air density decreases as altitude increases, Jim?

>> IOW, in order for air to rise, it must overcome gravity, which
>> requires energy (said energy in the form of temperature of the air
>> itself decreasing air density or the latent heat of vaporization

> How do you detect that?

Well, Jim, for the non-morons, we can "detect" that because we know
the molar weight and molar volume of water and air, and we know the
underlying mechanisms for physical phenomena, and can mathematically
model those phenomena.

For you morons, you have to make stuff up and get laughed at because
you have no way of mathematically modeling your kooky theory that
isn't full of holes.

But the question remains, Jim... why are you *so* moronic that you'd
create a kooky theory that was so easy to utterly destroy?

Another question, Jim... why can't you get your kooky theory through
the peer-review process? Because it's wrong, Jim. I proved it's wrong,
Jim.

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.usenet.kooks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 00:57 +0100
  Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 03:52 +0100
    Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 00:25 -0800
      Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-07 08:39 +0000
      Re: Clouds are made of water Ty Foyd <death@spank.666> - 2016-03-07 05:27 -0500
        Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 08:25 -0800
          Re: Clouds are made of water Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 10:54 -0600
            Re: Clouds are made of water Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 05:15 +0800
      Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:03 +0100
      Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:12 +0100
        Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-07 12:27 -0500
        Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:18 +0100
          Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 09:03 +0100
            Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:29 +0100
              Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:59 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 00:14 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:18 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-09 23:43 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 18:58 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 04:43 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 23:53 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 09:44 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:26 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-10 17:59 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:03 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 08:29 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-11 07:48 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 06:54 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-13 08:20 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-14 05:27 +0100
      Re: Clouds are made of water "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-07 17:35 -0500
        Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 17:56 -0800
        Re: Clouds are made of water madeforzyngagames@yahoo.com - 2016-03-07 18:17 -0800
        Re: Clouds are made of water Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:40 +0100
          Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 22:05 -0800
      Re: Clouds are made of water "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-07 20:08 -0500
        Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 17:56 -0800
          Re: Clouds are made of water "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-07 20:58 -0500
            Re: Clouds are made of water madeforzyngagames@yahoo.com - 2016-03-07 18:18 -0800
            Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 18:27 -0800
              Re: Clouds are made of water "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-07 21:30 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-07 18:34 -0800
    Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 17:45 +0100
      Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 20:14 +0100
        Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:55 +0100
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:15 +0100
            Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 05:36 +0800
              Re: Clouds are made of water - Part II Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:34 +0100
    Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-07 18:01 +0100
      Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 17:39 +0100
        Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 02:34 +0800
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-08 13:47 -0500
            Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 03:33 +0800
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 07:05 +0100
            Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-09 05:39 -0700
              Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-09 22:44 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 08:51 -0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 17:21 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 02:03 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 10:13 -0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 18:17 +0000
                Re: Mustaffa was Clouds are made of water - Part I buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 15:50 -0500
                Re: Mustaffa was Clouds are made of water - Part I Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:24 -0800
                Re: Mustaffa was Clouds are made of water - Part I buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:28 -0500
                Re: Mustaffa was Clouds are made of water - Part I Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 15:37 -0800
                Re: Mustaffa was Clouds are made of water - Part I buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-09 18:39 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-09 12:36 -0500
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 02:06 +0800
        Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 05:54 +0100
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A on!on@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2016-03-09 08:43 +0000
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 19:11 +0100
            Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 04:09 +0800
              Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:12 -0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 20:23 +0000
              Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-03-09 20:21 +0000
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-09 12:23 -0800
              Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 06:59 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-10 17:59 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-10 18:21 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 02:19 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-11 07:55 +0100
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-11 21:58 +0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-11 10:07 -0800
                Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart A Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-13 07:17 +0100
        Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart B Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 07:30 +0100
          Re: Clouds are made of water - Part I - Subpart B Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-09 20:28 +0100
    Re: HOH is lighter than OO and NN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 06:50 +0100
      Re: HOH is lighter than OO and NN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-08 08:26 +0100
  Re: Clouds are made of water binky feel good <julianfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 16:10 -0800
    Re: Clouds are made of water "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 18:02 -0700

csiph-web