Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #690329

Re: LIGO

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2018-06-12 15:08 -0700
References <72abe286-e049-4042-934b-871dfb7f2b28@googlegroups.com> <1a162410-25f0-4e81-83f0-69d085cc096b@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <f585a040-445b-43ce-a4ce-e569b95d19e2@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: LIGO
From "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 1:54:29 PM UTC-7, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
> Isn't it so cool that they can actually do that?!.. I think so! 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> The measurement uncertainty of a length is approximately 10^7 m yet LIGO is detecting a length variation of 10^-18 m which is criminal fraud. The LIGO are committing fraud.

When spending 1.4 billion and also claim LIGO can be so lucky to detect gravity waves over a time lapse of 1.4 billion LYs ago when two BHs hit each other and get away with it you know who is the power and glory in the world of science.Bert

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 10:28 -0700
  Re: LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-12 18:08 +0000
    Re: LIGO "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 13:26 -0700
      Re: LIGO "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-12 13:31 -0700
      Re: LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-12 18:21 -0400
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 13:30 -0700
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 13:54 -0700
    Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 22:06 +0000
    Re: LIGO "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-12 15:08 -0700
      Re: LIGO "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-12 20:23 -0700
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 15:34 -0700
    Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 01:17 +0000
  Re: LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 16:06 -0700
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-12 18:21 -0700
    Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 12:21 +0000
      Re: LIGO Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 06:15 -0700
      Re: LIGO benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-13 11:33 -0400
  Re: LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 11:28 -0700
    Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-13 18:40 +0000
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-13 12:27 -0700
  Re: LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-14 11:00 -0700
    Re: LIGO Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 05:04 -0700
  Re: LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-15 11:22 -0700
    Re: LIGO Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-15 14:45 -0400
  Re: LIGO furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-15 12:56 -0700
    Re: LIGO Volney <volney@volney.invalid> - 2018-06-15 17:00 -0400
    Re: LIGO Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-06-17 17:01 -0700
  Re: LIGO numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-18 14:55 -0700

csiph-web