Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Date | 2011-08-17 08:19 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> |
| Newsgroups | comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Next Big Thing |
| References | <z-2dnSdmpbqcHtfTnZ2dnUVZ7oudnZ2d@giganews.com> <j2e22t$qhl$1@dont-email.me> <c3d9b888-d0e7-4260-bfea-c648a37e043c@h9g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <20338456-6796-45b1-a6ba-2b63891ce1fb@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4E4B1290.4020004@SPAM.comp-arch.net> |
| Message-ID | <f43sh8-cv41.ln1@ntp6.tmsw.no> (permalink) |
Andy "Krazy" Glew wrote: > I have already talked about how, back when I was an undergrad Programmer > on Duty, I would teach people to use a concurrent assignment construct [snip] > > This is exactly the sort of thing that people used to hardware languages > are used to doing. Working in hw, it seems kind of obvious that you are working with wavefronts (clock signals and data) passing over all your various resources; programming then becomes the problem of getting as much use out of them as possible, while the usual multithreaded problem of synchronization sort of goes away. Is this the right way to think about it? Terje -- - <Terje.Mathisen at tmsw.no> "almost all programming can be viewed as an exercise in caching"
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Next Big Thing kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk - 2011-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Next Big Thing Stephen Fuld <SFuld@alumni.cmu.edu.invalid> - 2011-08-16 08:24 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-08-16 08:51 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-08-16 12:17 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-08-16 18:00 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> - 2011-08-17 08:19 +0200
Re: Next Big Thing Colin Paul Gloster <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org> - 2011-08-17 12:40 +0000
Re: Next Big Thing "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-08-17 08:20 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing MitchAlsup <MitchAlsup@aol.com> - 2011-08-17 10:43 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-08-17 18:19 +0100
Re: Next Big Thing "Andy \"Krazy\" Glew" <andy@SPAM.comp-arch.net> - 2011-08-17 23:39 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-08-18 07:27 +0100
Re: Next Big Thing torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-08-17 10:49 +0200
Re: Next Big Thing Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2011-08-17 05:37 -0700
Re: Next Big Thing mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-08-18 22:23 +0000
Re: Next Big Thing Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2011-08-24 20:44 +0200
Re: Next Big Thing nmm1@cam.ac.uk - 2011-08-24 20:23 +0100
csiph-web