Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #432857
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead |
| Date | 2017-09-19 14:16 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <f2bk0hFoe7bU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <6fe8f267-9e01-4a2a-b38e-e11245fcffcb@googlegroups.com> <f2bde4Fn2mmU1@mid.individual.net> <b209e22e-633f-4a65-b139-0d2ee9b62f29@googlegroups.com> |
On 19/09/2017 1:07 PM, John Gogo wrote: > On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 9:24:08 PM UTC-5, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 18/09/2017 10:17 AM, John Gogo wrote: >>> The sun is where it lies. So is the moon- not one second ahead. Who denies this or is able to show that this is not so? Will it be some clever relativistic device? I say what we see is unified- there is no distance or size which violates the theory. I say we see objects that are large enough to establish a synchronicity; regardless, of the greatest animations of Gedankin theory. >>> >> >> We know that eyes use light. We know that light travels at a finite >> speed. What evidence do you have that supports your theory? >> >> Sylvia. > > I think it lies in the category of undeniable truth. Let me ask you this: can you conceive of a Gedankin where light is observed (like the sun) where it appears to be? I wonder when we start seeing galaxies and stars that are so far away- that they start to violate the origins of the time of the universe. > So it's based on nothing at all. Your theory cannot even touch something as basic as how the image forms on the retina. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-17 17:17 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-09-17 17:54 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 20:22 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2017-09-17 18:20 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 17:09 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2017-09-18 17:50 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 20:18 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-19 12:24 +1000
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 20:00 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 20:13 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2017-09-18 20:07 -0700
Re: The Sun is seen where it lies in the sky and not eight minutes ahead Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-09-19 14:16 +1000
csiph-web