Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #2185

Re: Satellite A660

Newsgroups comp.sys.laptops
Date 2014-03-03 04:24 -0800
References <0cb0df72-3b39-45f0-b0d0-1311696a4ad1@googlegroups.com> <68e49fdb-53df-4eb9-9e0e-0a00c52c44d6@googlegroups.com> <d2dd45ea-731a-4293-82fa-2b97d652cfd5@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <f2800849-be61-41aa-bf23-1e0dff0db2f2@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Satellite A660
From Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Monday, March 3, 2014 12:57:03 AM UTC-6, andymh...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 28, 2014 1:02:58 AM UTC-5, andymh...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday, December 15, 2013 12:18:47 AM UTC-5, andymh...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > 
> 
> > > Never in my life have I used such an unmitigated piece of _____.  It has so much potential, but they decided to mix in an untested keyboard design.  Of all the things to f..ck with.  Why *not* replace a steering wheel on a porsche with a fricking wet noodle.  Talk about stealing defeat from the jaws of victory.  Can the crippling of an otherwise great design be done any more inanely?
> 
> > 
> 
> > > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > > Oh wait.  I'm going over the top.  It *is* a good design...if you intend to use it for gaming and media.  A great toy, a lethal miserable fakery of a work tool.  If I hadn't paid well over a grand for it, it physically would not be in one piece, at least so far.  I dearly hope that there is a maker out there that *doesn't* make such an utterly incomprehensible design decision.  At some point, this POS will end up...let's just say it will end.  It would be nice to know that there is actually a practical common-sense alternative.
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > Fracking piece of ass wiping trash.
> 
> 
> 
> This point cannot be emphasize enough.

We get it, thanks!

Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2013-12-14 21:18 -0800
  Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-02-27 22:02 -0800
    Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-03-02 22:57 -0800
      Re: Satellite A660 Bob_Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2014-03-03 04:24 -0800
        Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-14 19:13 -0700
          Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-16 17:22 +0000
            Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-16 22:44 +0000
              Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-18 17:30 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-19 00:56 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-20 14:04 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-23 19:02 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:40 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-19 02:41 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-19 09:34 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-19 22:29 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-21 20:33 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-21 23:24 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2014-04-23 00:02 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:59 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 Dominic Reich <usenet@tmsn.at> - 2014-04-23 19:26 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-04-26 11:46 -0700
                Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-05-03 14:53 +0000
                Re: Satellite A660 andymhancock@gmail.com - 2014-05-03 13:29 -0700
          Re: Satellite A660 wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2014-04-20 01:52 +0000

csiph-web