Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done.

Newsgroups	sci.physics
Date	2016-08-17 10:44 -0700
References	(4 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.12{2.15A.Seattle.2016}> <rcydneeMbtEJeDDKnZ2dnUU7_8xi4p2d@giganews.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Aug.12{9.29A.Seattle.2016}> <ce343dd6-019c-4be9-bb9f-5093b8d134c4@googlegroups.com> <ab9126c4-a068-4db9-b3b4-4460d5e2811b@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<ef237ad8-d75b-4889-b8b7-e85a339da1be@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done.
From	LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 9:38:55 AM UTC-7, LIGO Fraud Investigator wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 9:27:27 AM UTC-7, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 12:29:07 PM UTC-4, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> > > You ( Tom Roberts ) replied ( to me ):
> > > > > The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical.
> > > > 
> > > > Say, rather, that the probability "waves" of QM are a MODEL, not "physical".
> > > 
> > > "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done.
> > > 
> > > > The fact that we must use statistical theories of the fundamental constituents 
> > > > of our world is not merely "ignorance" -- as best we can tell that is an 
> > > > inherent aspect of their behavior.
> > > 
> > > Just because something is too complex to _fully_ understand,
> > > like tomorrow's weather, it doesn't mean that it's _truly_ random;
> > > in fact, we _know_ that it isn't.
> > > 
> > > Randomess is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less.
> > 
> > It is not the complexity that makes it random.
> > Even the simplest system appear random at plank scale.
> > We do not know if it is truly random, or
> > if it is a complex underlying layer.
> > Unless we can measure below plank scale, we cannot know.
> > 
> > You can claim it is our ignorance. but right now we
> > have to treat it as if it is truly random.
> > 
> > it would be interesting to KNOW the universe is
> > deterministic. Since you make that claim,
> > you need the proof. let us know when you have it.
> > 
> > I hope to hear about it soon.
> 
> The universe is probabilistic simply because there is no time dimension. Thus all interactions have the same durations because nature cannot calculate their durations. The problem is that this would break conservation laws because they call for interaction times to be commensurate with the energies involved.
> 
> Since nature time interactions, it is forced to use probability to ensure 

This should have been: Since nature cannot time interactions, it is ...

>that conservation laws are obeyed in the long run. This is why particle decay is probabilistic. This truth escapes the physics community because physicists have their noses stuck so far up Einstein's dead ass, they've gotten used to the smell of bullshit.
> 
> You heard it here first.
> 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

Thread

Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
  Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-12 13:32 -0700
  Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
  Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
    Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:47 -0500
      Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 12:10 -0700
        Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 12:29 -0700
          Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 13:44 -0700
          Re: Quantum "Statistics" ( not "Mechanics" ) is a horrible description of nature. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-15 16:51 -0700
        Re: Your S.S. check. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-15 13:42 -0700
          Re: Your S.S. check. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-15 17:14 -0700
            Re: Your S.S. check. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-16 13:14 -0700
              Re: Your S.S. check. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-16 13:44 -0700
      Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-15 18:01 -0400
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 15:32 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-16 08:45 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 10:31 -0700
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-16 16:25 -0700
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:35 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-17 13:37 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-17 17:52 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-08-18 13:23 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-18 22:17 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-19 11:04 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:59 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-20 15:18 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-22 23:30 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-22 23:54 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-23 10:36 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:37 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 17:34 -0500
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 20:49 -0400
            Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-18 20:25 -0500
              Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-18 23:22 -0400
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-19 10:10 -0500
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 08:35 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 13:57 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-19 16:37 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. "Henrietta Testicockles" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-08-19 19:24 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 04:11 -0700
          Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:27 -0700
        Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:13 -0700
      Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
      Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:32 -0700
      Re: Reduce your meds. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-20 11:44 -0700
        Re: MrAA believes in magic; to wit: a HeadsTailsSuperposition. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-21 13:46 -0700
  Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 09:27 -0700
    Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 09:38 -0700
      Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-17 10:27 -0700
        Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 10:41 -0700
          Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-19 14:35 -0700
            Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-19 15:11 -0700
              Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-08-22 23:26 -0700
                Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-23 10:46 -0700
      Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. LIGO Fraud Investigator <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 10:44 -0700
      mism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 16:15 -0700
        Re: mism noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 12:46 -0700
  Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-08-18 23:04 -0700

csiph-web