Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1463
| From | Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? |
| Date | 2012-06-05 21:57 +0100 |
| Organization | Roaima. Harrogate, North Yorkshire, UK |
| Message-ID | <ee82a9xj8i.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <4fcdf079$0$10739$5b6aafb4@news.zen.co.uk> |
Ralph <ralphzodapn@ymeal.com> wrote: > I know rsh is old not used anymore, and ssh is the way to go, and rsh > has security issues, but i'm just testing it on a small network of 2 > computers where i'm the only user and it's not open to the internet. I'd still go with ssh, and if you want equivalence logins then set up public/private certificates. (This is all "easy"... just ask if you're struggling.) > It's just for familiarity with it. Mmm, I suppose. But why bother wasting life becoming familiar with outdated, obsolete, and insecure software for which a better replacement is available? > My question Why is it that when you do rsh -l (to specify a different > username than the current one) Why does it ignore .rhosts? Fundamentally it's because the trust is applied on the client side, not on the server, and the rsh application tries hard to pretend to be fair. > http://linux.die.net/man/8/in.rshd > Also note that the design of the .rhosts system is COMPLETELY INSECURE > except on a carefully firewalled private network. Under all other > circumstances, rshd should be disabled entirely." I'd go further than that and remove the clause "Under all other circumstances" entirely. Really, there are NO circumstances where rsh is better than ssh, and many where ssh beats rsh hands down. Chris
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? "Ralph" <ralphzodapn@ymeal.com> - 2012-06-05 11:41 +0000
Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-06-05 21:57 +0100
Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? "Ralph" <ralphzodapn@ymeal.com> - 2012-06-06 19:39 +0000
Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-06-07 08:03 +0000
Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-06-07 10:21 +0100
Re: why does rsh -l ignore .rhosts? MJ <me@invalid.org> - 2012-06-17 04:00 +0000
csiph-web