Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #101838

Re: linking precedence rules

From Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: linking precedence rules
Date 2017-01-15 02:04 -0800
Message-ID <ee0vooFplabU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <87vathn26h.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <o5diu1$aun$1@dont-email.me> <o5dkni$htc$1@dont-email.me> <o5dmjp$p17$1@dont-email.me> <edviijFbp90U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/14/2017 1:12 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 01/15/17 06:21 AM, BartC wrote:
>> On 14/01/2017 16:49, David Brown wrote:
>>> On 14/01/17 17:18, BartC wrote:
>>
>>>> I understand that on Linux, files associated with an application are
>>>> disseminated all over the file system, and it has had to evolve schemes
>>>> to deal with that, which people have come to think of it as normal.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again, you understand incorrectly.
>>>
>>> An application may have a variety of files placed in a variety of
>>> standard directories - executables under /usr/bin, dynamic libraries in
>>> /usr/lib, and so on.  They are not "all over the file system" - the
>>> directories are well documented.  Some of the directory usage is
>>> "historical", but most is logical and practical.
>>
>> Yes, if I want to see the headers used by gcc, I can look in
>> /usr/include.
>
> If you want to see the *system* headers used by all compilers on a Unix
> system, look in /usr/include.
>
> If you want to find the *local* headers used by a gcc install, ask it
> (gcc -v).
>

Thx, Ian. I established this when I went down this rabbit hole but 
forgot its relevance.

C:\Users\Fred\Documents>gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=C:/Strawberry/c/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/4.9.2/lto-wrapper.exe
Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32
Configured with: ../../../src/gcc-4.9.2/configure 
--host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --build=x86_64-w64-mingw32 
--target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --prefix=/mingw64 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/c++ 
--enable-shared --enable-static --disable-multilib 
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes 
--enable-threads=posix --enable-libgomp --enable-libatomic --enable-lto 
--enable-graphite --enable-checking=release 
--enable-fully-dynamic-string --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs 
--enable-sjlj-exceptions --disable-isl-version-check 
--disable-cloog-version-check --disable-libstdcxx-pch 
--disable-libstdcxx-debug --disable-bootstrap --disable-rpath 
--disable-win32-registry --disable-nls --disable-werror 
--disable-symvers --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-arch=nocona 
--with-tune=core2 --with-libiconv --with-system-zlib 
--with-gmp=/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static 
--with-mpfr=/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static 
--with-mpc=/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static 
--with-isl=/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static 
--with-cloog=/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static 
--enable-cloog-backend=isl --with-pkgversion='x86_64-posix-sjlj, built 
by strawberryperl.com project' CFLAGS='-O2 -pipe 
-I/opt/build/x86_64-492-posix-sjlj-rt_v402/mingw64/opt/include 
-I/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-zlib-static/include 
-I/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static/include' 
CXXFLAGS='-O2 -pipe 
-I/opt/build/x86_64-492-posix-sjlj-rt_v402/mingw64/opt/include 
-I/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-zlib-static/include 
-I/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static/include' CPPFLAGS= 
LDFLAGS='-pipe 
-L/opt/build/x86_64-492-posix-sjlj-rt_v402/mingw64/opt/lib 
-L/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-zlib-static/lib 
-L/opt/build/prerequisites/x86_64-w64-mingw32-static/lib '
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.2 (x86_64-posix-sjlj, built by strawberryperl.com project)

C:\Users\Fred\Documents>


<snip>
-- 
Michael

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-07 23:49 -0800
  Re: linking precedence rules Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-08 21:20 +1300
    Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-08 01:32 -0800
      Re: linking precedence rules "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-08 11:08 -0500
        Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-12 03:25 -0800
          Re: linking precedence rules Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-12 13:31 +0100
            OT Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-14 01:18 -0800
      Re: linking precedence rules Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2017-01-08 15:38 -0800
        Re: linking precedence rules "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-08 18:46 -0500
        Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-12 04:13 -0800
          Re: linking precedence rules Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-12 12:21 +0000
            Re: linking precedence rules Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 00:23 -0800
              Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-16 06:20 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-30 05:10 -0800
              Re: linking precedence rules Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2017-02-04 17:12 +0100
                Re: linking precedence rules Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-08 20:47 -0800
          Re: linking precedence rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-12 13:31 +0000
            Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-13 01:58 -0800
              Re: linking precedence rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-13 10:41 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-14 03:49 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 12:03 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-14 14:02 +0100
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 13:46 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-01-14 14:23 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 14:31 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 16:18 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-14 17:49 +0100
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 17:21 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-15 10:12 +1300
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 21:59 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-14 14:12 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-15 11:39 +1300
                Re: linking precedence rules Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2017-01-14 16:03 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2017-01-18 11:51 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-15 02:04 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-14 23:48 +0100
                Re: linking precedence rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 20:28 +0000
                The Unix way vs. the Windows way (Was: linking precedence rules) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2017-01-14 14:14 +0000
                Re: The Unix way vs. the Windows way (Was: linking precedence rules) BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-14 14:29 +0000
                Re: The Unix way vs. the Windows way (Was: linking precedence rules) supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-01-14 14:20 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-15 01:40 -0800
                Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-15 11:43 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2017-01-18 19:55 +0000
                Re: linking precedence rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-14 14:22 +0000
              Re: comparison logic Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-13 16:05 +0100
                Re: comparison logic Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-13 15:37 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-13 16:06 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-01-13 19:37 +0100
                Re: comparison logic BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-13 18:42 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-13 18:49 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-01-13 20:50 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-14 01:05 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Michael Holiday <Mike@example.invalid> - 2017-01-14 01:27 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-14 13:56 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-15 14:45 +0000
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-15 20:42 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-15 21:04 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-01-30 04:47 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-01-30 11:40 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-03 16:42 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-03 18:45 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-08 21:03 -0800
                Re: comparison logic supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-09 08:07 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-09 08:50 -0800
                Re: comparison logic supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-09 12:15 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-09 12:38 -0800
                Re: comparison logic supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-02-09 14:13 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-02-09 14:45 -0800
                Re: comparison logic Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-02-12 10:20 -0800
          Re: linking precedence rules BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2017-01-12 14:32 +0000
          Re: linking precedence rules James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-01-12 13:33 -0500

csiph-web