Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #402246
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Formula for c |
| Date | 2016-12-19 15:46 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <ebp71sFcsu8U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <348f7ff8-0d5a-4e30-8a1b-5026450954cb@googlegroups.com> <ebp4nuFcea9U1@mid.individual.net> <954c78bd-d5af-41b4-b2f0-952681d46ad2@googlegroups.com> |
On 19/12/2016 3:31 PM, David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller wrote: > That is dimensionally inconsistent, which is another way of saying that > it's wrong. > > Sylvia. > > Maybe YOU are wrong about the architecture of space time ? > Has that even crossed your mind once ? It makes no difference, and I have tried to explain this to you before. If the equation is dimensionally inconsistent, then it only works for a chosen set of units. Since units are man-made, it's highly unlikely that the universe has any interest in a particular set. > Or are you just a dictionary regurgitating data?? > > > Yes , we all have heard you blather on about dimensions > But it seems no one in the mainstream can finish it or decrypt gravity Since when is gravity encrypted? Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 18:45 -0800
Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 19:14 -0800
Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 19:45 -0800
Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 15:07 +1100
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 20:31 -0800
Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 15:46 +1100
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 21:33 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-18 21:48 -0800
Re: Formula for c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-19 17:07 +1100
Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 07:44 -0800
Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 02:21 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:18 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:39 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 03:57 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 04:24 -0800
Re: Formula for c "David (Lord Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-23 04:59 -0800
Re: Formula for c Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 19:28 -0800
Re: Formula for c Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-12-23 13:03 +0100
Re: Formula for c alsor@interia.pl - 2016-12-23 11:15 -0800
csiph-web