Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #378146

Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You!

From Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You!
Date 2016-10-26 16:09 +0000
Message-ID <e7c2q6FgtcoU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <nuoh6c02qbe@news6.newsguy.com> <80f1487c-fe7c-4db2-86ce-8c46f88dc632@googlegroups.com> <nuqac7$vbv$1@dont-email.me> <e7bvc3FfmicU2@mid.individual.net> <nuqjjc$2ie$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016-10-26, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
> On 2016-10-26 11:10 AM, Jim Polaski wrote:
>> On 2016-10-26, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 4:58:29 PM UTC-4, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On a recent thread, a few of these despicable Microshit
>>>>> advocates claimed that GNU/Linux is a "high maintenance"
>>>>> OS, with the insinuation that such "high maintenance" is
>>>>> a serious deficiency.
>>>>
>>>> For the generic consumer use case, it most certainly is a deficiency.
>>>
>>> Only if it is true.
>>>
>>> In reality, linux has a lot less maintenance needs than windows ha.
>>> Updates are fully or half-automatic (whatever floats your boat), and they 
>>> come from one source, not this scattered update "experience" you get with 
>>> windows or OSX
>> 
>> Spare me.
>> I've just seen for myself how updates in Manjaro Linux rendered the 
>> system unbootable.
>
> I've been telling the Linux twats in here about this problem for years
> and been called a liar every single time. I'm glad that spindrift
> documented the problem as well as he has but am not surprised to see the
> Linux twats _still_ deny that there is such a problem.

The Linux COLA Cabal are crazy people. Liars, nuts and kooks every one 
of them.
There is no point in offering up any documentation to prove Linux's 
faults because they will claim it's been faked.

Linux would probably be doing better in the market place if the Linux 
advocates disappeared because they are more of a hinderance to Linux 
than a help.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-25 21:01 +0000
  Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 06:07 -0700
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 15:17 +0200
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 10:18 -0400
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 17:21 +0200
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 11:56 -0400
            Fuck You!  Go to Hell Mr. Maggot ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 11:17 -0700
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 12:11 -0400
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 10:21 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 23:23 +0200
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 14:34 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 00:46 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-26 19:07 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-27 09:37 +0100
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 02:47 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 12:08 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 03:16 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 12:34 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 04:08 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:12 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:06 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 16:35 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:44 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:56 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:11 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 06:06 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 16:34 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 17:59 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 12:13 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 18:30 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 12:48 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:02 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:14 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:21 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:27 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 05:36 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 07:54 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:08 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 08:11 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:18 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 08:26 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:20 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 08:51 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-27 11:52 +0100
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 04:15 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:57 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:02 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:23 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 05:48 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:18 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-27 09:49 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:22 -0700
                Re: Your vote is worth _exactly_ what it cost: nothing. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:58 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 02:19 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 11:44 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 03:08 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0400
      Fuck You Idiot! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:40 -0700
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-26 15:10 +0000
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 11:54 -0400
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-26 16:09 +0000
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 10:16 -0400
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 10:34 -0700
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 11:08 -0700
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 14:10 +0000
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:41 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 15:03 +0000
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 10:11 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 17:33 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 10:47 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 13:53 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 19:24 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 12:36 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 16:15 +0000
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 08:44 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 13:22 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-28 23:22 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-28 23:09 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-28 23:23 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:18 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-29 13:32 +0000
  Mjduhgfks, have you always suffered from delusions of persecution, or were you just born stupid? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:40 -0700

csiph-web