Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396809

Re: Why isn't ether confirmed

Show all headers | View raw

Am 05.10.2016 12:14, schrieb mlwozniak@wp.pl:

>> You apparently think, there exist a hidden committee, which confirms (or
>> rejects) scientific theories (???).
>>
>> But no such thing exist, hence a theory does not get confirmed. Theories
>> are what withstood attempts to disprove them.
>
> Well, somehow most of your fellow idiots have
> different opinion. Take a look at the Tom's
> quoting starting the thread, for instance.


You certainly mean the regular 'Tom Roberts'.

I would not call this person 'fellow' in any respect, since he usually 
attacks me or any of my statements.

>> It is more a question of acceptance in the general public and by the
>> special public of scientists, concerned with this particular subject.
>
> That's right.
> You have no confirmation.
> All you have is an insane belief that when you
> accepted it it has to be accepted by everyone.
> And your tales of zillions of experiments
> confirming your bullshit - are obvious lies,
> intending to "help" us to accept these right
> things you accepted.
>
>
>> If 'ether' is a somehow useful hypothesis, than such a hypothesis will
>> eventually be used.
>
> If your concept of "local time" was somehow
> useful hypothesis, the clocks of GPS would
> be set to indicate it.
> But they aren't.


GPS satellites do not fulfil the requirement of being local.

'Local' means 'near and at rest' and this is not, how satellites behave.

Especially they are not at rest, since they fly around in Earth orbit.

I am at rest - at least in my personal experience.

So I say, I'm at rest and the universe circles around me.

As generous person (and as centre of the universe) I decree the 
equivalent right to any other observer, who is the centre of his 
respective universe as well.

This would result in kind of 'subjectivism' and 'multiverse'.

GPS satellites are not real observers, but I would grant the same right 
to them as well, and they are allowed to define themselves as locally at 
rest and as having their own local time.

But this time is directed by the 'master clock', hence the satellite 
needs to synchronise his local time to our Earth time.

Now each local time could be easily synchronised within a certain 'time 
domain'. And the Earth' surface is apparently one.

But Earth orbit is a different one and satellites in orbits of same 
heights could be synchronised among each other, but it requires a few 
tricks to synchronise them with ground level clocks.



TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-19 03:35 -0700
  Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-09-19 09:12 -0700
  Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 11:05 -0700
  Re: Why isn't ether confirmed pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-09-19 17:15 -0700
    Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-09-19 19:08 -0700
    Re: Why isn't ether confirmed kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-09-22 05:29 -0700
  Re: Why isn't ether confirmed numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-09-19 17:22 -0700
  Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 05:46 +0200
    Re: Why isn't ether confirmed "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-09-20 22:11 -0700
    Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-20 23:23 -0700
      Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-21 08:50 +0200
        Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-21 00:09 -0700
          Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-09-22 08:23 +0200
            Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-09-22 00:04 -0700
              Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-04 05:37 +0200
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-05 03:14 -0700
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-26 09:00 +0200
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-26 01:16 -0700
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-10-30 22:16 +0100
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-10-31 00:24 -0700
                Re: Why isn't ether confirmed "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:17 -0700

csiph-web