Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #374613

Re: blah

From Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: blah
Date 2016-10-03 23:48 +0000
Message-ID <e5g92oFaitaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <nss2h1$upm$4@dont-email.me> <ahjgdoe98.38@perch.invalid> <nssfe2$lqj$3@dont-email.me> <e53d7baf-8cfc-44b7-9b9c-727d94a76d31@googlegroups.com> <nsuq0r$af6$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-10-03, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 10/3/2016 10:58 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 8:23:12 PM UTC-6, DFS wrote:
>>> On 10/2/2016 7:52 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/2/2016 6:15 PM, Silver Slimer wrote:
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2016-10-02 05:27 PM, DFS wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wth?  You're voting for Clinton?  I don't believe you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give us a public key, DFS.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What for?
>>>>>
>>>>> All you guys are doing is discussing Snit via encryption.  It's nuts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Other than Thelma stumbling around, do you see any Snit in cola?
>>>> I call it a success.
>>>
>>>
>>> Talking about him behind encryption is a fail.
>>>
>>> And this is 2 or 3 days.  Do you guys have the willpower to make it last
>>> for 3 months?  6 months?  2 years?
>>>
>>> Do you even want to?
>>>
>>> I think you guys NEED Snit.
>>
>> Most everyone needs comedy.
>
> Sure.
>
> But what I see is less comedy and more an extremely sick obsession with 
> one crazy person who apparently is a human posting backboard that 
> responds to just about every cola post.

From my perspective, the biggest problem with the Prescott Parasite is 
that he is very dishonest. He twists, misquotes and mangles what people 
say in order to fuel his own brand of chaos. And he poisons just about 
every single thread in this and other groups to the point that every 
thread becomes a discussion about him.
I've never seen anything like it before.

As for comedy, sure it's entertaining to watch him trip over himself and 
his various socks but in the big picture is it worth dealing with his 
destroying decent posts and advocacy at the same time?
I don't think it is.
But it's mostly the dishonesty that I find irritating.

>
>>> There's zero chance Carroll and Kohlmann
>>> can do without him.
>>
>> When he was a doing his jail stint, or whatever, few people talked about him, including Peter and myself.
>
> You sure about that?  I have all the data - I haven't done the analysis, 
> but I can determine the exact dates of the jail sentence (ha!) and I can 
> see how many times you and Kohlmann mentioned him during those dates.
>
> It won't be zero, of course.  But from you it will be a very unhealthy 
> amount I bet.

The Prescott Parasite was in jail?
Tell me more!

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

blah "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-02 20:27 +0000
  Re: blah Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-02 13:57 -0700
  Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 17:27 -0400
    Re: blah Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 18:15 -0400
      Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 18:42 -0400
        Re: blah Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 18:48 -0400
          Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:54 -0700
            Re: Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 00:59 +0200
              Re: Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:03 -0700
              "S*it" and his nyms ARE the herd ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 23:58 +0000
              Re: Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:58 -0700
            Re: Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 19:53 -0600
            Re: Herd claims they are too ashamed to share views of tech publicly Horace McSwain <spyderwingnut@techie.com> - 2016-10-03 22:02 +0000
        Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 15:49 -0700
          Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 19:54 -0600
            Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 19:01 -0700
              Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 12:19 -0600
        Re: blah "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-02 23:52 +0000
          Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 16:57 -0700
            Re: blah "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-03 00:02 +0000
              Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 13:03 -0600
          Re: blah Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 00:57 +0000
          Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 19:56 -0600
            Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-02 19:01 -0700
          Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-02 22:23 -0400
            Re: blah "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-03 02:50 +0000
              Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:33 -0700
              Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-05 09:14 -0400
                Re: blah "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-05 19:39 +0000
                Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-05 14:11 -0600
                Re: blah Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-05 16:43 -0400
            Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:36 -0700
              Re: blah Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-03 16:40 +0200
                Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 13:37 -0600
                Re: blah Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:59 -0700
            Re: blah Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 07:58 -0700
              Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 13:37 -0600
              Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 19:36 -0400
                Re: blah Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-03 23:48 +0000
                Re: blah Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-03 20:02 -0400
                Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:14 -0700
                Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 17:22 -0700
                Re: blah Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 20:06 -0700
                Re: blah DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-03 23:44 -0400
                Re: blah Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 21:08 -0700
                Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 14:05 -0400
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 14:00 -0700
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 17:54 -0400
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 22:28 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 22:32 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-07 19:38 -0400
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:02 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:01 -0700
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 20:05 -0400
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 01:21 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 11:09 -0400
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-08 05:23 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 07:52 -0700
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-08 15:14 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-08 08:25 -0700
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-08 16:02 +0000
                Re: Ping Steve Carroll: cleaning up GoogleGroup quote-mangled posts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-10-07 22:22 +0000
                Re: blah tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-03 21:32 -0700
        Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-02 19:52 -0600
  Re: blah Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-02 18:13 -0400
  Re: blah smirk <smirk@smirk.invalid> - 2016-10-03 02:18 +0000
    Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 13:38 -0600
      Re: blah smirk <smirk@smirk.invalid> - 2016-10-03 20:33 +0000
        Re: blah GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-10-03 16:40 -0600

csiph-web