Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373531

Re: ping Marek

From	Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: ping Marek
Date	2016-09-30 01:44 +0000
Message-ID	<e55uc8FqnbfU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <d9d41ad7-1d57-4337-ada6-e63bdf6cc212@googlegroups.com> <f276c827-dfb8-4c63-87d1-03d988da5975@googlegroups.com> <nsk8ks$1k4$2@dont-email.me> <e55n6hFp9ndU1@mid.individual.net> <hajgde9.jafi8@perch.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-09-30, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-29, Silver Slimer <> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-09-29 7:24 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 5:04:02 PM UTC-6, Steve Carroll
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 4:59:39 PM UTC-6, Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange wrote:
>>>>>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 3:24:09 PM UTC-6, Octavian
>>>>>>> W. Lagrange wrote:
>>>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What app is that?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> tin/vim.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Comment: GPGTools -
>>>>> https://gpgtools.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> hQIMA+W+Ippu/VtHAQ//SuvN0ZNgxVIHr3gZUG1iyqIGR8zqys2Dmn1dWoEr/q95 
>>>>> 9GaFxu2BMm2TB7ZA+dYR21c5nNrhD5S24J2VuHsCUwLaGx443aS9r3x71o6iXYB9 
>>>>> ue4TUPrWyDKSu8oEGAXfIk3vrjH5pXNHE2hxByrh3bLy668R0cgoUcS/F2yZJAQ2 
>>>>> GFt2udLYFP29ZSmIexXebpskEl+QF9xOR+HDnh6B9/RR1k+bYBoBEKW5LFALzp5/ 
>>>>> CLFYtovuXSQqicTWahlPc7+7csh+WrxNVK3gylWSXOkKnnX1mifn7ZR8QvMvrGqW 
>>>>> 9ZoGWmXBFH9NBUQFSO7VK9QYQ25JZnGCSgqHyQoP/ErRs31yu85o1a7JoE3EEpbe 
>>>>> tfovqXiYJU+CNN1zmswwt5IVZXF9MbuSMOHfmz0Cj2/zoN8ysqT/aWsDAS3lgIVm 
>>>>> updMxgmSxMZb3oJAvXFr0I4Oo8AC3Zjn7Yhr7L9wA116WNrWtrxjl97s7Yssnbcj 
>>>>> riFvRKaYT/UBK9F+puuDMb77riJuO7pGl4Ksbe+StTG9KWqZTdv5dj3KhiX3WSgQ 
>>>>> GDNRlrnHjePd0Vr0IaSuXTngNLCK8X6B+CPw0f8pwJax6JtpkQA8wirsgxH+xXnA 
>>>>> UPeBOz0a3xltMaXFvdBOKriy0ev0CVWgS3BIyByouD6mpQWGR6xy9v70Aim4W66F 
>>>>> AQwDZuuZanuRsAoBCACt9sZmxp92fPwjq8VkGvroID80ke9pVOY6c/NrakvBIa5X 
>>>>> JYdCAV9RM7q/Dv4VoY7JuFaozdxecMdrtcq31fcFKxB5JXB1A/gOSsNyR0g5J1ke 
>>>>> rh/cj4B0ih7pUVTYdtqGw7Z0I3ql525bbEfimwfjAT6HzCX/ju1eFXomURFafgUP 
>>>>> YLVHJu4v+sCazI9MqEb9j2RZEImPgTL1+xsYiPvMLxjOkO5UHNICoUKPjKgmtto7 
>>>>> Ia3bLLymeaoXo8Mu/oBANpeF5a9xPqq/GVUfUBcJgumQK4QuPUl/s8mBgecGa0X7 
>>>>> Vba6n2HRzX+rMex1aSeJDCyTiHiS+YfjvYa0/Lfc0l0BDLEiSDwz9obmaHetv3yG 
>>>>> mG/G6I5G+8fsF2uNasysHxWB8RE2jtKIB0O4Or9rVJq5YTv9i11DF+YfzIV+KoQM 
>>>>> 2juynuzljRvJxwdavyMKovnxapLILFbcy1VJyd0= =OISj -----END PGP
>>>>> MESSAGE-----
>>>> 
>>>> What gives? I can read yours but no one else's.
>>>
>>> People have to be careful when posting an encrypted message to
>>> actually select who they want to have reading it. It's cumbersome, but
>>> look at it this way: if, in the future, we want to post to the whole
>>> newsgroup and want everyone but the Prescott Parasite to be able to
>>> read it, we'll be able to simply omit checking his name and he'll only
>>> see the same kind of gibberish as what you just quoted.
>>>
>>>
>>> - -- 
>>> Silver Slimer
>>> Islam is a disease
>> 
>> IMHO you guys are shooting each other in the foot.
>> Most people are just going to move on without reading it.
>> 
>
> It's fairly transparent with something like thunderbird/enigmail.

I must be missing something. Stick with me on this one. 

1. You guys create a public key, load it up to a server somewhere.
2. People see your message with all the key hex stuff in it.
3. What now?

I see several types of messages here in COLA.

1. Message with the key at the end.
2. Message with no key
3. Message that is nothing but a key. 

So for 1 and 2, I can read them fine. One look at the email or header 
and I know if it's the real person based on what I know about that 
person.

What is 3?
Is that just you guys sharing the key?
Or is this something that is completely encrypted that cannot be read 
without the key?



>> The way to eliminate the Prescott Parasite is to completely ignore him.
>> Talk about him but not directly to him. It's obvious he is showing the 
>> early signs of a breakdown already. The side benefit is we all get to 
>> watch him implode. 
>
> This has the same effect and also slams the door in his face.  He's
> starting to climb the walls already.  It would be interesting to see
> how things turned out if everybody participated.  Get gpg and post
> a public key.  DFS is skeerd for some reason. 

I'm gonna try it, but be warned I know less than zero about this so I'm 
going to screw it up and ask for help digging myself out of my own mess.

The Prescott Parasite is indeed climbing the walls.
No question about it. His latest Star Trek Rainman act is quite odd 
indeed.

Thread

ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 21:24 +0000
  Re: ping Marek Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-29 21:29 +0000
  Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 15:44 -0700
    Re: ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-29 22:59 +0000
      Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:03 -0700
        Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:24 -0700
          Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-29 19:38 -0400
            Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:40 -0700
              Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 07:47 -0400
                Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 08:49 -0700
                Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:13 -0700
                Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:16 -0400
            Re: ping Marek Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-29 23:42 +0000
              Re: ping Marek Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:27 -0700
              Re: ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 01:14 +0000
                Re: ping Marek Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 01:44 +0000
                Re: ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 02:13 +0000
                Re: ping Marek Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 02:22 +0000
                Re: ping Marek Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-30 03:44 +0000
                Re: ping Marek Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 21:40 -0700
                Re: ping Marek Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 19:12 -0700
                Re: ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 03:17 +0000
                Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:05 -0400
                Re: ping Marek Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 18:33 -0700
              Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 07:49 -0400
            Re: ping Marek Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-29 17:48 -0700
          Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 16:41 -0700
            Re: ping Marek "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 00:47 +0000
              Re: ping Marek Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 19:08 -0700
                Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 08:06 -0400
            Re: ping Marek Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 00:51 +0000
            Re: ping Marek Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 07:48 -0400

csiph-web