Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #39093
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: gamma |
| Date | 2016-09-24 04:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <e4md0gF3jjhU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ns33rb$q78$1@ls237.t-com.hr> <D40AB40C.7E2EC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <4caf8acf-e908-4a2f-bd59-26adaa3c136c@googlegroups.com> |
On 2016-09-24, tmelmosfire@gmail.com <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, 23 September 2016 17:27:31 UTC, Snit wrote: >> On 9/23/16, 4:19 AM, in article ns33rb$q78$1@ls237.t-com.hr, "Askfor" >> <askfor@nowhere.net> wrote: >> >> > This might not be completely on-topic, but I think I could get an answer >> > here, one that might be better than elsewhere. >> > >> > What is gamma, related to imaging and monitors ? Most explanations >> > include some graphs, but how does it affect my visual experience ? How >> > is it related to common visual attributes, like brightness, contrast and >> > saturation ? Is there some sort of method to translate gamma into some >> > combination of those three ? >> >> If I understand correctly (and I might not!) brightness is, at least in >> theory, linear... all levels of brightness on the screen are effected the >> same: in other words both dark and light parts of the screen are brightened >> (or made less bright). >> >> Contrast works by making a bigger difference between dark and light areas... >> but in a linear way (I think). It tends to make the near-whites and >> near-blacks get pushed to the extremes and you lose details. >> >> Gamma impacts both: the bright parts of the screen more than the dark... so >> the curves you are seeing is showing how much more. Usually they show >> brightening the black parts little if any and the white ones a lot with >> those of different luminance values in some exponential way. This impacts >> the contrast without "blowing out" the near-whites and near-blacks. > > Thank you. Good explanation and something I have wondered about. Another snit sock puppet. Are you guys getting this yet? I hope so.
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
gamma Askfor <askfor@nowhere.net> - 2016-09-23 13:19 +0200
Re: gamma "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2016-09-23 14:10 +0000
Re: gamma Askfor <askfor@nowhere.net> - 2016-09-23 16:50 +0200
Re: gamma Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-09-23 20:23 +0000
Re: gamma Askfor <askfor@nowhere.net> - 2016-09-23 18:00 +0200
Re: gamma Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-09-23 20:26 +0000
Re: gamma jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-23 14:48 -0700
Re: gamma Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-09-23 10:15 -0700
Re: gamma jrg <connyank@cox.net> - 2016-09-23 10:32 -0700
Re: gamma Askfor <askfor@nowhere.net> - 2016-09-23 19:55 +0200
Re: gamma Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-23 11:05 -0700
Re: gamma Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-23 10:27 -0700
Re: gamma tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-23 21:06 -0700
Re: gamma Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-24 04:16 +0000
Re: gamma tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2016-09-24 00:58 -0700
csiph-web