Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #50221

Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raper, socked up as Nadegda,
in <news:nk70c6$3qm$38@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> At a quarter to one in the morning

Wrong. Still too stupid to figure out time zones, Paul Derbyshire? LOL

>> Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raper, socked up as ko0oki
>> kensi the lunkheaded libtard, in <news:nk3sb7$7tc$1@gioia.aioe.org> did
>> thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

>>> https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/16/antarctic-co2-hits-400ppm-for-first-time-in-4m-years

>> That must be why temperatures in Antarctica have been trending down...
>> because after all, CO2 has been proven to cause global *cooling* by none
>> other than NASA.
>> 
>> That must be why sea level is falling as Antarctica has been adding an
>> average 112 billion tons of ice per year and temperature has fallen by
>> 0.019 C / decade... and has been for nearly 25 years, Paul...
>> 
>> <http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/TLT/plots/RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Southern%20Polar_Land_And_Sea_v03_3.png>
>> <https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses/>
>> 
>> <http://wcrp.ipsl.jussieu.fr/Workshops/SeaLevel/Posters/3_14_Willis.pdf>
>> "Recent decrease in upper ocean thermosteric sea level Recently updated
>> estimates based on in situ profile data show a decrease in globally
>> averaged, 0/750 m thermosteric sea level between 2003 and 2005 of
>> approximately 7 mm. The decrease in thermosteric sea level is due to a
>> loss of approximately 3.2 x 10^22 J of heat from the upper-ocean during
>> this period (Lyman et al., 2006)."
>> 
>> Whoopsie... isn't that the same time period when you Klimate Katastrophe
>> Kooks were k'laming that ocean heat content took off at a rate that was
>> 24 times faster than the 1950 to 2000 average? LOL
>> 
>> Does... does that say sea level *dropped* by 7 mm due to water
>> contraction due to temperature decrease? LOL
>> 
>> SPNAK! on Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raping unemployable
>> welfare-mooching shroomtard. LOL
>> 
>> <http://www.pas.rochester.edu/~douglass/papers/PLA_21192_proofs_plusFigs1_2.pdf>
>> "In an earlier study of ocean heat content (OHC) we showed that Earth's
>> empirically implied radiation imbalance has undergone abrupt changes.
>> Other studies have identified additional such climate shifts since 1950.
>> The shifts can be correlated with features in recently updated OHC data.
>> The implied radiation imbalance may possibly alternate in sign at dates
>> close to the climate shifts. The most recent shifts occurred during 2001
>> – 2002 and 2008 – 2009. The implied radiation imbalance between these
>> dates, in the direction of ocean heat loss, was −0.03 +- 0.06 W/m^2,
>> with a possible systematic error of [−0.00,+0.09] W/m^2."
>> 
>> WTF?! Does that study say the radiation imbalance is *negative*? And
>> that the oceans are *losing* heat? LOL
>> 
>> Hmmm... and the sun's activity is now lower than the Dalton Minimum,
>> projected to go lower than the Maunder Minimum... you remember the
>> Maunder Minimum... it precipitated the Little Ice Age.
>> 
>> SPNAK! on Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raping unemployable
>> welfare-mooching shroomtard. LOL
>> 
>> <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL066749/full>
>> ============================================================== As the
>> surface is generally warmer than the atmosphere, the total long-wave
>> emission to space is commonly less than the surface emission. However,
>> this does not hold true for the high elevated areas of central
>> Antarctica. For this region, the emission to space is higher than the
>> surface emission; and the greenhouse effect of CO2 is around zero or
>> even negative, which has not been discussed so far.
>> ==============================================================
>> 
>> Does... does that say that CO2 acts as a *negative* feedback in
>> Antarctica, Paul?
>> 
>> SPNAK! on Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raping unemployable
>> welfare-mooching shroomtard. LOL
>> 
>> <http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/>
>> ==============================================================
>> "Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats", explains James
>> Russell of Hampton University, SABER's principal investigator. "When the
>> upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as
>> hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."
>> 
>> For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere
>> absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO,
>> the two most efficient _coolants_ in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95%
>> of that total back into space.
>> ==============================================================
>> 
>> <https://i0.wp.com/i1172.photobucket.com/albums/r565/Keyell/SpectralCoolingRates_zps27867ef4.png>
>> Notice how CO2 has a cooling effect right from the lower stratosphere
>> and up into the mesosphere, its peak cooling effect around the
>> stratopause, while ozone has a clear warming effect in the lower
>> stratosphere (and even into the troposphere) but a cooling effect like
>> CO2 in the middle and upper stratosphere.
>> 
>> Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission Rudolf W. Gunnerman Energy and
>> Environment Laboratory; University of Southern California, Los Angeles,
>> California, USA; Institute of Oceanology of Russian Academy of Sciences,
>> Moscow, Russia
>> <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.306.3621&rep=rep1&type=pdf>
>> "The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature
>> of atmosphere. Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse
>> effect show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results
>> in cooling rather than warming of the Earth's atmosphere."
>> 
>> And global cooling has been occurring...
>> 
>> <http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
>> The UK Met trend shows an accelerating -0.014 C per decade *decrease*.
>> 
>> Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
>> The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a
>> 0.6186 F *decrease* from 2005 to 2015.
>> 
>> <http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
>> Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
>> orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
>> cooling has set in... since 1998.
>> 
>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.
>> 
>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
>> *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
>> years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>
>> 
>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
>> years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
>> archived it):
>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
>> temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.
>> 
>> "There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that is
>> not statistically significant." - Phil Jones, professor at the School of
>> Environmental Sciences at the scandal-rocked University of East Anglia.
>> 
>> <http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
>> "We have been building models and there are now robust contradictions,"
>> says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for Climatic Research.
>> "Data from observation says global cooling. The physical model says it
>> has to be warming."
>> 
>> ===============================================================
>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>
>> 
>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
>> warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public relations
>> problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked
>> University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag.
>> 
>> You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
>> ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
>> ===============================================================
>> 
>> SPNAK! on Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raping unemployable
>> welfare-mooching shroomtard, who can't refute the reality I promulgate.
>> 
>> <snicker>

> http://www.skepticalscience.com/Stratospheric-Cooling-and-Tropospheric-
> Warming.html
> 
> Kook.

Thank you for proving me right, you moron. LOL

What's that got to do with the fact that NASA, UAH, RSS, NSIDC and UK
Met all show sea water temperature and land surface temperatures have
been trending down, Paul?

SPNAK! on Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raping
unemployable welfare-mooching shroomtard, who can't refute the reality
I promulgate.

<snicker>

Did... did Paul G. Derbyshire the goat-raping shroomtard
get outed *again*? Didn't you k'lame you were in Europe, Paul? LOL

Date: 03 May 2016
MID: <ng9mdq$m43$33@dont-email.me>
MD5: 28e199bc366b04f624161a7e7c6d9ee6
IP: 67.70.57.221
Location: Deep River, ON, Canada

Date: 10 Jun 2016
MID: <njf6m0$9i5$13@dont-email.me>
MD5: 5a7d8d855af84388d01b7dc826ef09d4
IP: 67.70.57.173
Location: Deep River, ON, Canada

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178"; logging-data="29843";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Adding the Injection-Info: header into an E-S post gets it rejected.
Go on, Derbyshire, do it again, if you claim to be able to do it at
will.

Make it exactly this:
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1.1.1.1";
logging-data="29843";

Well, Paul? We're waiting. <tap, tap, tap> Nothing, Paul?

<snicker>

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

Everyone is laughing at you, Paul Derbyshire. Everyone.

Spankard. ShroomTard. Failure.

<snicker>

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs>
Subject: The Derbyshire Saga
================================================================
[ Posted on Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:39:04 GMT ]

Ok, kids... here's the voice from the cheap seats, on the Derbyshire
Saga (tm).

Now, having read about young Paul (the short, whiny, irritating,
psychotic child that he is) having been dragged from a lab by "the
man", I can only assume that this little story occurred a) yesterday,
and b) in the Steacie building.

The coincidence of two such occurrences cropping up in the same day
"here in the trailer park" would be just too far out to contemplate.

It would seem, then, that young Paul Derbyshire is taking first year
chemistry. As an aside, I'll note that this isn't his first little
"fling" with the department. Shortly before Christmas, the undergrads
had their lab techniques exam. Paul, to whom we can add "clumsy" as
one of his many ignoble traits, couldn't perform under pressure
(begging the question...). Long story short:  He flipped... lost it
completely. Started swearing first at the proctors, then at the lab
supervisor, and lastly, after having been ejected from the lab, lashed
out at the department Chair. (Oh, yes, cursing, swearing, threatening,
the whole nine yards.)

Btw, this goes partly to the issue of "why didn't the TA in question
squash Mr. Derbyshire like a bug?". Since the repercussions could've
been significant.

In any event:  Yesterday, Paul spilled something in the lab. He
refused to clean it up. (I believe his exact words were "I am not a
human mop.". He kept asking other students to clean up his mess, and
became obstinate when pushed to take care of it himself. When he
started screaming and ranting, the lab supervisor called security on
him.

The fellow who responded is a human mountain named Al. Really nice
guy. Anyway, Paul was standing at the sink with a corrosive solution
in a flask, and refused to leave. "I'm busy, can you come back when
I'm not so busy" is the purported comment he made. Al refused to
apprehend him until the chemicals were secured, so, with security and
the lab supervisor watching, Paul returned to his bench, and continued
his experiment. This involved clamping the offending flask, at which
time Al moved in for the kill (so to speak).

Paul struggled, and managed to punch Al in the face (knocking off his
hat!). Al became... vexed, shall we say, and grabbed Paul by the neck
in a sort of headlock. (If you can imagine tiny Paul hanging, feet
kicking, whilst Al lifts him from behind with one arm around the neck
you have the proper picture.) Al then removed him from the lab, put
him on the ground, and proceeded to cuff him.

(Paul:  "what are you doing!?")

Al calls for backup at some point.

Al: "540, this is 8, I need backup for a..." etc.

Paul:  "Talking in police code doesn't make you any better than me."

Note:  All Paul comments were in a Sam Kinison-like screech at this
point.

Campus security backup arrives, as to the "real cops". They mention to
Paul that he's going "downtown" where he will be their guest for "a
long time". As he is being dragged out of the building, Paul is
screaming "What do you mean 'a long time'? I have things to do
tonight!"

Well... sorry if my prose isn't the greatest.  The story is much
better with voice-over, and particularly when you know all the people
involved. (except Paul, of course). I heard it first hand from a guy
in my lab who witnessed the whole event, btw. He does great Sam
Kinison impersonations.

I hear Paul is now the proud owner of a "No Trespass" restraining
order to keep him from the premises of Carleton University.

Semper Inquirens  (thx, Corey)
================================================================

Brian Publicover wrote:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs/lS73j-DcD04J>
================================================================
I remember in grade 8 Paul once threw a chair at my head because I
suggested that he liked girls (he used to hate females when he was
younger). This was not an isolated incident: I've seen him attack many
people. I don't think he's dangerous (unless he is holding corrosive
chemicals), but I'd hardly call these incidents "bizarre quirks."
================================================================

Awww, poor bootfucked little kooktard Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke,
Ontario, Canada has to relive his horrible past all over again... on
top of having his stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet each and
every day. LOL

And now he's been outed as a dude who likes wearing dresses. And 
raping goats. LOL!

-- 

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature =
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even
basic geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has k'lamed that magnetism
has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then
backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature
due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't
know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and
denies the existence of magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has described a
universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe
in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could
not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality. Kensi the moron is Paul
G. Derbyshire.

<snicker>

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Uh-oh, spaghettio kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-18 12:19 -0400
  Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-06-18 12:57 -0400
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-06-18 17:58 +0000
      Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-06-18 14:15 -0400
      Leave It To a Denierrrrr... AlleyCat <al@aohell.com> - 2016-06-18 17:01 -0500
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-18 19:34 +0000
    Greenhouse effect: Influence of atmospheric CO₂ (was: Uh-oh, spaghettio) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-20 10:57 +0200
  Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-19 06:46 +0200
    Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-19 20:47 +0000
      Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-20 07:07 +0200
        Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-21 01:22 +0000
          Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-21 05:37 +0200
            Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-21 20:51 +0000
              Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-06-22 05:35 +0200
              Re: Uh-oh, spaghettio kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-06-22 06:40 -0400

csiph-web