Re: alignment shame (?)

Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Date	2012-11-30 11:38 -0800
References	(2 earlier) <9f3f3acc-d396-4ad6-9f64-378ede00aefc@googlegroups.com> <9af3e529-5e44-4ac0-8b3b-696ebfd60940@n5g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <50B8E2C0.1090401@verizon.net> <40d5aeb3-2e87-4272-be89-98194af21a1f@bx4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <50B903F6.5000503@verizon.net>
Message-ID	<e1663fe5-6fa8-48b0-b66e-7544e4e03df5@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: alignment shame (?)
From	fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

W dniu piątek, 30 listopada 2012 20:07:34 UTC+1 użytkownik James Kuyper napisał:
> On 11/30/2012 01:57 PM, ImpalerCore wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 30, 11:45 am, James Kuyper <jameskuy...@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> >> On 11/30/2012 10:42 AM, ImpalerCore wrote:
> 
> >> ...
> 
> >>
> 
(...)
> 
> I can't - but the OP only said that he would prefer a standardized
> feature, which _Alignas() is. He didn't specify a particular version of
> the standard that had to support the feature. The fact that he's willing
> to even consider a non-standardized feature implies he's much less
> strictly bound by coding standards than I am.

I would like to try some alignments searching 
for possible speedups. By now I do not used 
other than defaults, but would like to try if 
4096-alignments of arrays would speed up and so. I do not even know by now how this 
alignments things in distinct compilers look like and also how standarisation of it looks like also *. (Now I know it partially: must 
check up compiler specyfic opts or possibly 
search for _Alignas implementations (if it 
can allign to as much as 4096)

Thread

alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 01:25 -0800
  Re: alignment shame (?) Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-11-30 10:46 +0100
    Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 03:24 -0800
  Re: alignment shame (?) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-11-30 05:22 -0800
    Re: alignment shame (?) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-30 08:52 -0500
      Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 06:55 -0800
  Re: alignment shame (?) ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 06:56 -0800
    Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:17 -0800
      Re: alignment shame (?) ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 07:42 -0800
        Re: alignment shame (?) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-30 11:45 -0500
          Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 09:42 -0800
          Re: alignment shame (?) ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 10:57 -0800
            Re: alignment shame (?) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-30 14:07 -0500
              Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 11:38 -0800
        Re: alignment shame (?) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2012-11-30 09:33 -0800

csiph-web