Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #364840

Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past.

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 08.08.2016 17:12, schrieb Jeff-Relf.Me:
> TakuyaSaitoh wrote:
>>  I need to go back to the past some 30 years
>>  to warn myself of some disastrous events coming.
>
> _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past;
> the (4d) TimeScape is static.  The more ignorant you are,
> the more you (erroneously) believe in"free will".
>
> We were programmed by nature to breathe, drink, etc.


Actually I don't think so.

IOW: you must not think in therms like '4d-space'.

It's actually a little tricky.

I would say, that spacetime has a topology of 3d-time.

'Space', as we use that term, is based on a certain, but arbitrary 
direction of time.

Since I call matter 'timelike stable structures' and since the observer 
is a material object, the observer choses the timeline, which enables 
him to stay together in one piece as material object.

This is the obvious choice for the local axis of time.

In 'relativity lingo' the axis called 'timelike' is vertical and has the 
angle zero.

The light-cone has the angle 45 °, what stands for c in vacuum.

And the inverse to timelike is called 'spacelike' and in right angle to 
the axis of time.

Now: the angle 45° is always 'relative' to the timeline of the observer, 
hence space is 'relative', too.

That is slightly counter-intuitive, since matter is then also observer 
dependent.

Anyhow...

If you would like to leave your particular axis of stability, you simply 
need to accelerate from zero (velocity) to something different (then 
your tv).

This is in fact possible (in most cases), since you have the choice to move.


TH

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The rate at which the time axis grows, relative to the spatial dimensions. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 07:18 +0200
  Re: Objects there are frozen in time, to us humans. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 01:30 -0700
    Re: It's all relative, you know ? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:08 -0700
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-08 11:02 -0700
        Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-08 13:14 -0500
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-08-08 22:52 +0200
        Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-09 06:51 -0500
          Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-09 17:51 -0400
      Re: _Nothing_ can change the future, present or past. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 20:10 -0700
        The Multiverse strikes back Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 01:34 -0700
        Re: BioLuminescence. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 02:02 -0700
          Re: Randomess is ignorance, nothing more, nothing less. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-09 05:54 -0700
            Re: The (4d) TimeScape is static; it's not alive, not ever. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-10 00:08 -0700
              Timetravel to the past possible when spacetime bends back on itself! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:22 -0700
                Re: Timetravel to the past possible when spacetime bends back on itself! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 10:28 -0700
                Re: The SemiRandomness of Quantum Mechanics is just ignorance. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-11 16:44 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 10:04 -0500
                Re: "Virtual Reality" is a _model_ of reality; even when it's poorly done. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: Correction: "Virtual Particles" and "Probability Waves" are intrinsically _random_. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-13 10:07 -0700
                Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Michael J. Strickland <michael06582@comcast.net> - 2016-08-14 20:42 -0400
                Re: Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 18:09 -0700
                Free Energy Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-15 08:26 -0700
                We can control the past! Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-16 22:46 -0700
                Re: Reduce your meds. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-17 11:02 -0500
                Re: Reduce your meds. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-17 18:24 -0700
                Wormholes could finally unite two of history's biggest physics theories Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 08:33 -0700
                Re: The ProbabilityWave is _virtual_, not physical. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:06 -0400
                Double-Slit Experiment Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 22:12 -0700

csiph-web