Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #607466
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? |
| Date | 2016-12-01 23:06 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <e0n6hd-2a2.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <LSK%z.49713$X11.21707@fx19.am4> <eh96hd-r01.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nq10A.150505$a14.143297@fx45.am4> |
JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> wrote: > On 01/12/2016 19:16, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> As for shooting cars at steel plates, does tearing the plate to pieces >> count as penetration? > > > ok put it this way: if the car goes totally (or lets say 10 meters) to > the other side of the plate we can say it penetrated it, yes. In reality any car that went through all but the thinnest of steel plates, e.g. foil, would not come out the other side as a car. What is holding this plate in place such that the plate is not simply pushed? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 01:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:00 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 11:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:42 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 09:33 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 10:30 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 12:39 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:22 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 16:28 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 07:07 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 19:16 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:24 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 17:00 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-02 00:13 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:19 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:51 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 19:03 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:44 -0500
csiph-web