Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.space.policy > #57019
| From | Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.space.policy |
| Subject | Re: Apollo 11 source code released |
| Date | 2016-07-13 21:01 +0300 |
| Organization | Tidorum Ltd |
| Message-ID | <dune04F6p46U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <MPG.31ed42b4228b7dbc98979b@news.eternal-september.org> <duhkokFondfU1@mid.individual.net> <MPG.31ee0992edd41c3798979c@news.eternal-september.org> <dul2o9Fk2rpU1@mid.individual.net> <ld5bobdj2t0nfdvi14d2e6f2b72q9oj3b4@4ax.com> |
On 16-07-13 04:14 , Fred J. McCall wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 16-07-12 03:53 , Jeff Findley wrote:
>>> In article <duhkokFondfU1@mid.individual.net>,
>>> niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid says...
>>>> But the Wikipedia entry also says this:
>>>>
>>>> "The AGC also had a sophisticated software interpreter, developed by the
>>>> MIT Instrumentation Laboratory, that implemented a virtual machine with
>>>> more complex and capable pseudo-instructions than the native AGC. These
>>>> instructions simplified the navigational programs. Interpreted code,
>>>> which featured double precision trigonometric, scalar and vector
>>>> arithmetic (16 and 24-bit), even an MXV (matrix × vector) instruction,
>>>> could be mixed with native AGC code. While the execution time of the
>>>> pseudo-instructions was increased (due to the need to interpret these
>>>> instructions at runtime) the interpreter provided many more instructions
>>>> than AGC natively supported and the memory requirements were much lower
>>>> than in the case of adding these instructions to the AGC native language
>>>> which would require additional memory built into the computer (at that
>>>> time the memory capacity was very expensive)...."
>>>
>>> The examples given for functionality of the interpreted code bits sound
>>> an awful lot like subroutines.
>>
>> Yes, but the basic AGC instruction set seems IMO very unfriendly to
>> subroutines -- it is possible to call ("TC", "Transfer Control") a
>> subroutine and save the return address, but it would be quite difficult
>> or at least cumbersome to pass arguments, as there are no easy
>> base+offset addressing modes.
>>
>> The INDEX instruction can be used to build such addressing modes, but
>> one base+index computation would take several instructions and at least
>> one temporary memory location if both "base" and "index" are dynamic
>> (non-constant) values, as would often be the case for accessing
>> subroutine arguments that are vectors or arrays.
>>
>
> Easy enough to use something like FORTRAN Common to fake this.
Fortran Common areas are global variables, not subroutine arguments that
can point to different variables on each call.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
Back to sci.space.policy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-10 12:43 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-10 20:33 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-10 18:28 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-10 21:27 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 00:36 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-11 06:44 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-11 16:20 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-11 20:53 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-12 14:36 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 18:11 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-12 23:37 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 18:14 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-13 21:01 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 20:06 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-14 06:44 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-15 23:54 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-17 11:49 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released William Mook <mokmedical@gmail.com> - 2016-07-17 18:41 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-18 09:20 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-14 11:38 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-16 00:10 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:26 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:49 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 09:12 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-11 11:51 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-12 02:19 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-11 20:58 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-12 09:24 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 10:10 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-13 21:07 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-13 20:08 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-14 11:25 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-15 22:39 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:40 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-12 14:41 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-12 23:26 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-12 21:41 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-13 08:54 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-13 06:43 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-13 21:08 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-14 11:34 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> - 2016-07-15 23:06 +0300
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-15 19:48 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-15 19:59 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-17 12:00 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Jeff Findley <jfindley@cinci.nospam.rr.com> - 2016-07-17 12:14 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2016-07-17 12:56 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 10:04 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-12 09:43 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Alain Fournier <alain245@videotron.ca> - 2016-07-11 19:43 -0400
Re: Apollo 11 source code released Fred J. McCall <fjmccall@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 11:39 -0700
Re: Apollo 11 source code released William Mook <mokmedical@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 18:28 -0700
csiph-web