Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #2121704
| From | "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: hey Brits! |
| Date | 2016-06-08 09:34 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <drp3vkF4u11U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <4f3294fe-4306-4f1d-956d-56150bd86819@googlegroups.com> <nj4hhp$1h7r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <kljblblo5k44fanul15nhnncmlpv0m65j1@4ax.com> <d78af19a-a96b-4f13-89d9-11cdfc465ff3@googlegroups.com> <t6mdlb93ta9pourkc0ti3ejm64lonv31b0@4ax.com> |
On 08/06/2016 00:59, Les Hellawell wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 05:12:42 -0700 (PDT), Robert Carnegie > <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Okay, maybe it is possible to launch an American > > made missile with British made > >> nuclear > > weapons > >> missile to attack America. But I think >> I won't do it until I have more than one of them. > > It would be madness and mass murder to launch such a vile > thing anywhere. We should scrap the damn things not renew > them as is currently planned. They never served any useful purpose and > young men should not be wasting their lives sat in submarines in the > depths of our oceans for months on end. We have far far better things > to spent our hard earned money on. (cue usual statement about how many > NHS hospitals we could build instead). In a world with only two superpowers, our trifling arsenal only served a very marginal purpose if at all. But today? Nations with nuclear capability are proliferating -- and so is the threat. It isn't so long ago that two demented dictators in the Middle East (Hussein and Gaddhafi) were actively working on developing a nuclear arsenal capable of hitting the UK. Without the means of responding to that threat in kind, those loonytunes might well have ended up using their weapons, either as a threat or by launching them. For such nations, the old rule of Mutually Assured Destruction still holds. Aside from all that, I am unhappy at leaving even more of our nation's security up to the Yanks. > > As it is they wll probably cost a fortune to dispose of. We dispose of our old warheads quite routinely, and replace them with new ones.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: hey Brits! Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 04:08 -0700
Re: hey Brits! Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-06 14:51 +0000
Re: hey Brits! Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 09:35 -0700
Re: hey Brits! Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-06 19:05 +0000
Re: hey Brits! Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-06 20:30 +0100
Re: hey Brits! Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 05:12 -0700
Re: hey Brits! Les Hellawell <les@shant.tell> - 2016-06-07 15:59 +0100
Re: hey Brits! "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-08 09:34 +1000
Re: hey Brits! Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 03:12 -0700
Re: hey Brits! Malcolm McMahon <malcolm.mc74@googlemail.com> - 2016-06-08 05:47 -0700
Re: hey Brits! "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-09 18:41 +1000
Re: hey Brits! "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-08 09:25 +1000
Re: hey Brits! Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-06-08 19:03 +0000
Re: hey Brits! "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-06-07 09:15 +1000
csiph-web