Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #351803

Re: LOL underestimated

From vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: LOL underestimated
Date 2016-04-25 19:07 +0000
Message-ID <do7888FsmspU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <dnpqjfFf3j2U3@mid.individual.net> <ghjdk90aafe.kgi@rooftop.invalid> <dnq12vFf3j2U5@mid.individual.net> <dnq158Ff3j2U6@mid.individual.net> <hgji9a03f.a@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:05:50 +0000, owl wrote:

> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:45:51 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:25:14 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:10:00 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Underestimated the time it would take.  Probably about 90 days at
>>>>>> this rate.  LOL.  Restarted the 200GB file write after starting a
>>>>>> series of attacks on the problem space for a particular match.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://vid.me/9qwp
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They've been running all night and only about half way to flipping
>>>>>> the first digit on the left part.  It needs to flip 32 times before
>>>>>> it's done.
>>>>>> This is when you appreciate Linux uptime and X11 virtual desktops.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Got GPU?
>>>>> 
>>>>>    https://github.com/xpn/CUDA-MD5-Crack
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> No NVIDIA here.
>>> 
>>> Well, you might save yourself some time by getting one. ;P
>>> 
>>> Or...
>>> 
>>>    http://www.nvidia.com/object/gpu-cloud-computing-services.html
>> 
>> Well, assuming you don't have some other sort of GPU -- there's always
>> OpenCL for ATI, I do believe.
>> 
>> 
> That sounds cool, but I don't really want to spend any money.

How goes the cracking?

Do you not have a GPU in your computer?  Even the SIMD stuff in Intel HD 
graphics could help, if I'm not mistaken.

-- 
 -v
"Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft
is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 15:10 +0000
  Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 16:55 +0000
    Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 17:25 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 18:45 +0000
        Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 18:47 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:05 +0000
            Re: LOL underestimated vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-25 19:07 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-25 21:16 +0000
        Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 20:51 +0200
  Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 19:19 +0200
    Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 17:34 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 20:31 +0200
        Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:13 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:20 +0200
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:29 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-20 14:33 -0700
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:58 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:04 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:25 +0200
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 21:41 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-20 23:50 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:06 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-21 08:54 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 17:12 +0000
              Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:50 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-20 23:51 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-20 23:59 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:10 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 00:11 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 22:19 +0000
                Re: LOL underestimated Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-21 00:57 +0200
                Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 00:07 +0000
      Re: LOL underestimated DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 23:17 -0400
        Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 03:49 +0000
          Re: LOL underestimated DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 10:27 -0400
            Re: LOL underestimated owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 16:26 +0000

csiph-web