Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349031
| From | Homer <usenet@slated.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. |
| Date | 2016-04-08 18:28 +0100 |
| Organization | Slated.org |
| Message-ID | <dmq825Fh6a2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <nduans$68g$1@dont-email.me> <dmobv9F2n9lU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.7{5.59P.Seattle.2016}> <dmohnqF3v21U1@mid.individual.net> <57f429cc-0887-4d93-9013-62f915abbb9e@googlegroups.com> |
On Friday 08/04/2016 9:52 AM, John Gohde wrote: > On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 10:01:33 PM UTC-4, Homer wrote: >> On Friday 08/04/2016 1:59 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>> Hordes of people would _love_ to have a desktop, but can't afford it. >> >> And yet that same demographic somehow manages to spend over $700 on a >> smartphone (or more if they pay by contract), with which they could >> probably have bought your PC at least twice, had they been interested. > > > Funny, how Moi can buy a modern class tower case desktop PC for just > $5 USA? In fact Dell computers offers their Dell OptiPlex 745 model That's a Goodwill initiative, not Dell itself. But in any case, that doesn't actually change the argument, in fact it only reinforces it, as it demonstrates that the majority would rather spend $700+ on a smartphone than even as little as $5 on a desktop. > As a closet Web Developer, I have absolutely no interest in writing > content for the new zombie class of Web surfers. That's your prerogative, however be aware that you are excluding a demographic that is at least three times that of the desktop, and growing exponentially year by year. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2645115 (Table 2). If your objective is earning a living, then excluding the largest demographic is a self-defeating exercise. If not, then good luck and enjoy your hobby. -- K. http://slated.org
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 14:14 -0400
The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 12:27 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 16:18 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:18 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 00:48 -0700
mental illness comes in many different flavors John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 03:21 -0700
Re: mental illness comes in many different flavors DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-05 10:47 -0400
Happily, mental illness comes in many different flavors.. DooFuS prefers Shit flavored, above all else. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 07:50 -0700
Gohde wants to ban CLI in Linux is like the Muslims want to ban pork in Western schools Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 18:29 -0700
Who let the dogs out? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:13 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-05 10:26 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-07 10:55 -0400
Just because you can does NOT mean that you should, Ass Wipe John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:03 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-07 12:19 -0400
Says, who? The DooFuS on COLA, says you. Enough said ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:24 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 10:17 +0000
What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 03:29 -0700
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 12:13 +0000
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 05:28 -0700
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:32 -0500
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 05:53 -0700
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 23:33 +0000
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-08 19:41 -0400
Re: What does a Goober know about anything? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 07:28 -0500
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 10:56 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 11:15 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-07 12:01 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. X11 Sucks <xsucks@xxx.org/null> - 2016-04-04 21:52 +0100
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-04 23:11 +0000
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 19:19 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 08:48 +0200
The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-05 05:53 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 07:09 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 14:15 +0200
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 09:35 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 16:09 +0200
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 10:23 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-05 09:50 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 10:22 -0400
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-05 13:05 +0100
Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 09:34 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 10:57 +0200
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 07:06 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 01:23 +0100
Re: Hordes of people would _love_ to have a desktop, but can't afford it. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 03:01 +0100
I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 01:52 -0700
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 18:28 +0100
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 15:55 -0400
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 16:07 -0400
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 01:02 +0100
Countless millions exposed to microshaft viruses as well 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-10 11:46 +0000
Re: Countless millions exposed to microshaft viruses as well Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-10 09:45 -0400
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:52 -0700
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 08:09 -0500
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 18:45 +0000
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 12:08 -0700
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:58 -0500
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 00:56 +0000
Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 09:55 -0700
Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 18:07 +0100
Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 15:42 -0400
Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 00:55 +0100
Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-10 08:10 -0400
Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Apple doesn't sell what I want, nor does Google; so I go DYI/custom. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 00:53 +0100
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:05 -0500
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 17:46 +0100
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 13:04 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-09 07:48 -0300
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-09 08:37 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-09 14:53 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-09 17:49 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:46 -0500
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:46 -0500
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:05 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 14:13 -0700
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:27 -0400
Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-12 23:13 +0100
The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's great success Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0400
The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 13:56 -0400
csiph-web