Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #566098
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Theory of Everything..... |
| Date | 2016-03-28 08:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <dls0ctFpob2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <56E606E4.5CB3@ix.netcom.com> <dkn44rFc8hmU1@mid.individual.net> <nc9tcr$96q$1@dont-email.me> <dks994FmaluU1@mid.individual.net> <ncbp6o$6as$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am 16.03.2016 15:08, schrieb Warhol: >>> See how tiny these seeds are? They are the smallest seeds I have ever >>> seen. A mustard seed is so small that if you were holding one in your >>> hand and dropped it on the ground, you might not be able to find it. >>> Even though the mustard seed is one of the smallest of all seeds, when >>> it is planted in the ground, it grows into a plant so large that birds >>> can perch on its branches and can even build their nests in it. I have >>> read that these tiny seeds can produce a plant that grows ten feet high >>> or more! >>> >>> Great things grow from small beginnings. >>> >>> The Messenger would also say; "I say to you, if you have faith the size >>> of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to >>> there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you." >>> >>> So He told they didn't need a large amount of faith... Just Surrender & >>> Prepare Silver or else... >> >> Well, maybe the mountain will move if you drop a mustard seed... > > Do you have reading comprehension problem??? > Actually not. But occasionally I like to promote my own invention, called 'structured spacetime'. That was how I wanted to connect General Relativity (providing spacetime) and Quantum Mechanics (what is responsible for particles). It is actually a simple idea, but a little unusual: you have an 'element of spacetime' (equivalent to a point) and connect that to the neighbouring 'elements' is a certain way. This connection is similar to how quaternions are multiplied, if you want to model a rotation: v'= q * v * q^-1 With such a simple model it is possible to replicate most phenomena in physics (like e.g. particles). Particles are not 'things', but 'structures' (or: patterns) of/in spacetime -> 'structured spacetime'. https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6 TH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 15:22 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-13 16:33 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-15 22:07 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 06:29 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Warhol <molarh@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-16 15:08 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-28 08:13 +0200
Re: The Theory of Everything..... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 06:13 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 06:07 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 06:47 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 07:04 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 13:02 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:31 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:00 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:53 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 12:00 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-03-13 16:46 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Malcolm McMahon <malcolm@theriomorph.me.uk> - 2016-03-14 11:06 +0000
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:04 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 11:37 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Vincent Maycock <vam100@aol.com> - 2016-03-14 17:50 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:17 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:18 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-03-16 20:19 +0100
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-14 12:02 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 13:14 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 09:16 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:07 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-15 09:40 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:41 -0700
Re: The Theory of Everything..... benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 23:01 -0400
Re: The Theory of Everything..... "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 20:20 +0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-16 23:42 -0800
Re: The Theory of Everything..... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-18 22:04 -0800
csiph-web