Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #160118
| From | "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Ransomware |
| Date | 2016-02-22 13:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <dj15mtF16htU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <OBFyy.8691$Rv2.4789@fx04.iad> <dj0qc1FsktlU1@mid.individual.net> <6xHyy.19055$Nf2.1353@fx14.iad> <dj10mkFuav1U1@mid.individual.net> <2rIyy.688$%L2.455@fx34.iad> |
"Scott Lurndal" wrote: > "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> writes: >>"Scott Lurndal" wrote: >> > >>>>> There's a random number generator in the CRC Math Handbook that would >>>>> work, if a bit slowly. >>>> >>>>Well it's not in *my* copy of CRC :-) >>> >>> It's a table in the back. You're supposed to take a pencil, >>> close your eyes, and touch it to the page. My copy dates from the >>> mid-70's >>> and is a box in the attic - it could have been in the chemical handbook >>> instead. >> >>Oh, *that*. Yes, my CRC has that, but that's just a *table* of random >>numbers not a *generator*. That's not suitable for a one time pad, since >>every college graduate of a certain age in the US with a technical degree >>has that book, so it doesn't meet the "one" criterion for a one-time pad. >>The smiley was because I thought my copy was a *lot* older than yours. It >>turns out it was just ... older. > > It's the human with the pencil that is the generator. How likely is it > that two people will randomly select the same set of numbers using that > method? Not very likely. But a properly generated one-time pad is *provably* secure, anything else is subject to *solutions* presented by experts all over the world coming out of the woodwork. ---- I wonder if you have in mind the table from_Reference Data for Radio Engineers_? Unless I made a mistake, there are only 6400 starting points in that table. I think someone with a handy-dandy library of crypto breaking code would break that before lunch. ... But my point was the principle, not the numbers
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0600
Re: Ransomware scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-22 15:14 +0000
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 10:12 -0600
Re: Ransomware "hgww" <hgww@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 04:13 +1100
Re: Ransomware scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-22 17:26 +0000
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0600
Re: Ransomware sidd@situ.com (sidd) - 2016-02-22 13:19 -0500
Re: Ransomware scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-02-22 18:28 +0000
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 13:26 -0600
Re: Ransomware Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-02-24 09:24 -0500
Re: Ransomware Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-22 15:19 -0600
Re: Ransomware Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-22 15:57 -0600
Re: Ransomware Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-22 16:27 -0600
Re: Ransomware Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-22 17:57 -0600
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 15:59 -0600
Re: Ransomware Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-02-22 20:54 -0600
Re: Ransomware Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-22 21:27 -0600
Re: Ransomware Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-02-25 08:33 -0500
Re: Ransomware Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2016-02-24 09:23 -0500
Re: Ransomware "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-02-24 08:40 -0600
csiph-web