Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376501
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... |
| Date | 2016-02-19 11:26 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <din5puFem5iU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1e328569-399e-4476-a566-1161a97de700@googlegroups.com> <7bc28c45-d73b-4d3f-89e1-9df88837beee@googlegroups.com> <31291904-9bf2-46dc-b7f3-3625e612b6f6@googlegroups.com> <31f55035-2cca-49ae-bf9e-9927ab9f9b7f@googlegroups.com> <na4o6p$1tot$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 19/02/2016 2:32 AM, Monique de Brabant wrote: > Gary Harnagel wrote: > >>>> "1. to state or set forth the meaning of (a word, phrase, etc.)" >>> >>> Fine, now define "state", "set forth", "meaning", "word and "phrase". >> >> Your "asking" that proves you are an idiot troll. > > Not at all, lady. That definition is incorrect, can't you see it? In > physics "define" is primary used in connection with a phenomenon, which > appear "as is" in Nature. The most fundamental in connection with such a > phenomenon is that it's appearance is persistent, aka repetition. > > As you clearly can see, lady, "define" is rather a definition coming from > Nature, and not from humans. Hopefully you just learn another thing you > may benefit in your daily physics. Thank me later. > The universe defines the phenomena. Humans define the words. The link between them is often elusive in this group. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 01:40 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-17 22:20 +1100
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 03:23 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 18:32 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 22:59 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 06:02 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:32 +0000
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 08:06 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-19 11:26 +1100
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-18 22:54 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-18 23:10 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-18 19:23 +0100
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 11:34 -0800
Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-18 20:38 +0100
csiph-web