Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #375292

Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ?

Show all headers | View raw

On 30/01/2016 11:37 AM, jamesl51165@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 6:22:10 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>> Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And, does the second particle assume the "state" of the first, or the
>>>>>>>> opposite state after the first is observed ? Thanks, Bob
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Bob, try thinking of an entangle pair, triple or group as a single
>>>>>>>       quantum entity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scientists Could Simulate Alien Abductions over 20 Years Ago
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48RX6xqKjnU
>>>>>
>>>>> Its nonlocal probability wave interference...
>>>>>
>>>>> But nonlocal won't work.
>>>>>
>>>>> How do we see a double opposite emission of light.
>>>>> How do we know the two photons that come out?
>>>>> have we observed it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> It's not necessary to know. The experiment looks at the correlation
>>>> between photons that are emitted within some narrow period. The
>>>> correlation is too high for a local model. This result is consistent
>>>> with the majority of the pairs of photons being entangled, but the
>>>> validity of the experimental outcome doesn't depend on that being what's
>>>> actually happening.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> How do we verify double emission of light in opposite directions?
>>> How would we know we are dealing with that doubled photon?
>>> Statistically this is so far than reasonable as to be ruled out
>>> by astronomical quantities of light waves. Which one do we measure...
>>> Light is like atoms in quantity; there are so many we would never
>>> know if we measured any particular one. Light is statistically
>>> measured.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> We would need to weigh energy at absorption.
>>> This is the only property to measure that would
>>> tell us anything; and it is so far from being probable to do.
>>> If measurement is out we need not pretend we know that something.
>>>
>>> Light is a dual force with the EM Forces manifesting as two waves...
>>> but what about the third wave of probability wave function?
>>>
>>> Light is a double force with a third wave... this is bad theory
>>> probability waves have been replaced in Quantum Mechanics
>>> with an Einsteinian order theory.
>>>
>>> Mitchell Raemsch
>>>
>>
>> There seems little point in my repeating myself.
>>
>> Sylvia.
> Light;s measurement is only statistical not individual
> like atoms the quantities of light wave are astronomical.
> New light by fission and fusion radiation means
> the hypersphere universe is filling constantly
> with more light. at the Big Bang there was first light
> that light like all light gets redshifted by Hypersphere
> universal expansion.
>
> Stars are full of light the sustains there continuous
> luminosity far beyond our puny hundreds of years of observation.
> Give science 300 million years to construct the future
> of the Herzsprung Russel diagram.
>
> Prove that we have measured the right light waves from a
> double emission. How have we observed double emission?
> We would have to know where light is going to be absorbed..
> Can we know by what atom to measure...?
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
>

Suppose it's the case that we cannot know whether any particular two 
photons were emitted together.

What do you think are the consequences of that?

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? Lara Croft <character@development.org> - 2016-01-26 17:21 +0000
  Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-26 18:03 -0800
    Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 18:28 -0800
    Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-29 12:13 +1100
      Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-28 17:42 -0800
        Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-29 13:22 +1100
          Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-01-29 16:37 -0800
            Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-31 21:26 +1100
              Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-04 20:44 +0000
                Re: Quantum Entanglement Question ? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-05 12:21 +1100

csiph-web