Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #375211
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? |
| Date | 2016-01-30 22:10 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dh3k0oF98ofU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <efd0ef3a-31b5-49d2-ab67-d0dea3d8fe87@googlegroups.com> <dh0arlFem49U1@mid.individual.net> <5e275dbb-421f-4c50-9c54-904f7c5a423e@googlegroups.com> <dh0bu7Feu6jU1@mid.individual.net> <de132b75-6828-4c54-ac33-d1a546c6e925@googlegroups.com> |
On 30/01/2016 3:57 PM, John Gogo wrote: > On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:34:02 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else > wrote: >> On 29/01/2016 4:20 PM, John Gogo wrote: >>> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 11:15:36 PM UTC-6, Sylvia Else >>> wrote: >>>> On 29/01/2016 4:11 PM, John Gogo wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:05:21 PM UTC-6, Sylvia >>>>> Else wrote: >>>>>> On 29/01/2016 5:50 AM, Henry Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> Such experiments are still difficult but are now >>>>>>> possible, particularly OWLS comparisons. There can only >>>>>>> be one answer. The whole physics establishment is >>>>>>> involved in a massive conspiracy to protect the name of >>>>>>> the hoaxer Einstein. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You could do them yourself. No one's stopping you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sylvia. >>>>> >>>>> I've already done them I'm my head. Nobody wants to follow >>>>> the recipe. >>>>> >>>> >>>> In your head doesn't count. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> It a least has to be a duet; otherwise, it make no sense. >>> >> >> Light emitted from a moving source either moves at speed c relative >> to an observer, or it doesn't. Real experiments would indicate >> which. >> >> To do an experiment in your head, you'd have to choose. The result >> would tell you nothing about the real world. >> >> Sylvia. > > I believe that light doesn't but EMR does. You believe that sight is > part EMR. But sight, light does not contain a velocity. C, the speed > of light, only comes into the scenario scientifically, when we are > dealing with TWO-WAY measures. All of the literature says this. > Modern science does not deal with sight/light. Instead, it primarily > deals with light rays and mirrors which are "contained"- so that the > distances inside these containers are capable of measuring a > quantity- a limit. More importantly, man needed a measure which could > be defined outside of nature- irregardless of nature.. > All of which is entirely beside the point. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-28 18:50 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 17:48 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-29 15:05 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 21:11 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-29 16:15 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 21:20 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 21:23 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 21:27 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-28 21:29 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-29 16:33 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 20:57 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-30 22:10 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 20:31 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-29 11:30 +0100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-29 07:06 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-29 19:48 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 14:41 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-30 11:49 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 05:17 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Polikwaptiwa <polikw@polikwamail.org> - 2016-01-30 15:34 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 20:43 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-02-06 16:52 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-06 09:53 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-02-07 15:41 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-07 10:26 -0600
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? ˌsōlər ˈpleksəs <solar@plexus.org> - 2016-02-07 20:04 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-08 08:19 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-08 20:35 +0100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-11 09:09 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 08:40 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-08 08:03 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-07 18:49 -0600
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-07 17:41 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-08 09:02 -0600
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Καλυψώ <calipso214@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:39 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-08 10:00 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-10 09:26 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 16:49 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-09 21:47 -0600
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 20:04 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 20:13 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 04:31 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 16:59 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 17:38 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 17:50 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 17:57 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 19:12 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 19:35 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 19:38 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-12 04:43 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 17:58 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-11 18:01 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? HGW <hw@...> - 2016-02-11 08:37 +1100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-10 14:24 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-30 18:26 -0600
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Harumi Kazuko <harumik@starwarsmail.org> - 2016-01-31 00:50 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 20:53 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 05:22 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 19:58 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-31 20:03 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-01 05:51 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-02 19:51 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-02 20:17 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-02 19:02 -0800
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-30 10:17 +0100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Henry Wilson <HGW@home.com> - 2016-01-30 11:52 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Polikwaptiwa <polikw@polikwamail.org> - 2016-01-30 16:26 +0000
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-01-30 21:07 +0100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-02-01 09:58 +0100
Re: Why Are Direct OWLS Experiment Using a Moving Source Not Being Performed? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-01-30 17:53 -0600
csiph-web