Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #281490

Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars?

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars?
Date 2016-01-27 07:04 +0100
Message-ID <dgr4vdF5909U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <56A79D44.47B1@ix.netcom.com> <dgqt4oF3i05U1@mid.individual.net> <9NXpy.189097$L45.78671@fx09.iad>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Am 27.01.2016 05:34, schrieb benj:

>> They were never there. A combination of optical illusions, poor
>> telescopes and wishful thinking.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> They are still there, but the water is gone. It all boiled away due to
> the Martians producing too much CO2 and creating global warming.
> Greenhouse gases on Mars were growing just as on Earth but Martians
> refused to change their ways (because they had no Algore or Sam Wormley
> to lead them) and now the atmosphere is 95.32% CO2 and the intense
> warming and storms boiled all the water away. So sad.
>

If the Mars has about 95 % CO2 in the atmosphere, we had to find out, 
where the CO2 came from.

Since the Martians have most likely not burned dead dinosaurs, to drive 
cars or head their mansions, we need to find out, from were the 
carbondioxid came.


I don't think, that even such a global climate protector like Al Gore 
would have prevented the Mars atmosphere to fill entirely with CO2 
(since he would have needed something else to breath).

The lack of O2 also questions the source of CO2 from burning, since 
oxygen is a necessity for fire.

But - maybe - the lack of plants is, what makes the atmosphere of Mars 
so filled with CO2. And lack of plants means lack of wood, which cannot 
burn, without someone to ignite it.

So CO2 is not reason for Marsian warming, but lack of plants is reason 
for lack of cooling.

Earth would - most likely - have started with an atmosphere of CO2 
(mainly). But the water we have on Earth has developed life and that O2, 
by photosynthesis from CO2.

Now the plants have absorbed most of the CO2 and so we need to burn 
wood. Otherwise the plants would starve.


TH

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Whatever happened to the canals of Mars?  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-01-26 08:22 -0800
  Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-26 08:37 -0800
    Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? wdstarr@panix.com (William December Starr) - 2016-01-30 21:56 -0500
      Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-30 22:12 -0800
  Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-27 14:50 +1100
    Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 23:34 -0500
      Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-27 16:58 +1100
        Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:21 -0500
          Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-28 22:22 +0100
            Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:19 -0500
      Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2016-01-27 07:04 +0100
      Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-28 22:34 -0600
    Re: Whatever happened to the canals of Mars? Double-A <doublea333@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 13:45 -0800

csiph-web