Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #155590
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products |
| Date | 2015-12-25 05:50 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <de2t3kFrh5oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <n5gsfi$l0r$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Laurent Delacroix <laurent@krutt.org> wrote > I don't want to start a flame war against Apple (for sure they're not > the first and not the last company to consider 6 years old products > "vintage" and unsupported), it's just that... you know, I've been > thinking about what the average user does with his machine and how it > has barely changed in the last decade. Yes websites have way more bells > and whistles, user interfaces are now laden with sugar (transparencies > and smartphone-like effects of dubious utility) but you still fire up a > browser and it takes a few seconds to load. You open up Word or > LibreOffice and that loading bar and sluggish interface is still there > just like it was in Word 95. "The complexity of software seems to > outpace improvements in hardware, giving us the sense that we're running > in place" said Jaron Lanier (http://bit.ly/1OE1mKx). > Pretty much every PC manufacturer is shipping machines with insanely > high performing processors even compared to what they had a few years > ago. The most basic Mac Mini retails at the ridiculously low price of > 569 EUR (here in Italy at least, but I guess Apple Store prices are the > same more or less throughout the world) and comes with a low-end i5 > in which the graphics department only can run circles around dedicated > graphic cards of a few years ago. Same goes for the iMac. And yet > there's a 2.5" 5400 rpm drive inside both computers, totally killing the > user experience and making the machine infinitely slower and I/O bound. On the other hand, a hell of a lot of stuff comes with an SSD now instead. > So: > * when did we stop delivering performance? We haven't yet with SSDs. > I remember watching a 1993 presentation in which > a 486 DX2 was compared against a Pentium. The > benchmark was... PowerPoint slides per second. And > the Pentium delivered. You could feel it. Today you can't. You can with a system with an SSD even now. > The blazing fast processors we're shipping to end > users are killed by non-existing I/O performance. > The top of the line i7 processor on a rotational disk > would be put to shame by the Core Duo + SSD I'm > running in this laptop in everyday usage. Sure, but that i7 on an SSD is still noticeably better with some stuff like video companding. > * how come no one seems to have realized that we're "running > in place", we're doing the same exact stuff, just inside a more > polished (and less functional, IMHO) user interface? We aren't really with the move to smartphones and tablet UIs. > And why are most users ready to give up perfectly > working computers (and phones - well, aint't the > two the same these days?) just to write our email > or spreadsheets in a more colorful interface? Essentially because so many have nothing but their high end smartphone now. > End of rant :-) > Have nice holidays everyone.
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Laurent Delacroix <laurent@krutt.org> - 2015-12-24 14:37 +0100
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Alan Ralph <usenet@alanralph.fastmail.uk> - 2015-12-24 15:38 +0000
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Al Kossow <aek@bitsavers.org> - 2015-12-24 08:30 -0800
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-12-24 13:27 -0500
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2015-12-25 08:27 +0100
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-12-25 20:22 -0500
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-12-25 15:47 -0400
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products - Emacs Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2015-12-25 20:28 -0500
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products - Emacs Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2015-12-27 00:08 -0400
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-12-25 05:50 +1100
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2015-12-24 20:54 -0600
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-12-24 19:02 -0800
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-12-25 11:18 +0000
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products mausg@mail.com - 2015-12-25 12:13 +0000
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2015-12-27 08:10 -0800
Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-12-27 16:30 +0000
csiph-web