Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.atheism > #2027662

Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 19-December-2015 5:55 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:22:05 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:32:03 +1100, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>
>>> On 18-December-2015 4:29 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:24:58 +1100, the following appeared
>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger <me@nothere.biz>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 16-December-2015 4:47 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 03:19:30 +0000 (UTC), Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:52:20 -0500, mur wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You atheists would probably love it because it's such a pussy forum, run
>>>>>>>> by the biggest pussy on the internet who trashes everything that
>>>>>>>> challenges strong atheism and bans peope who challenge what little his
>>>>>>>> cowardly brain is able to take into consideration. The challenge I
>>>>>>>> defeated all you people with defeated him and all his fellow pussies
>>>>>>>> ENTIRELY, just as it did all of you atheists in these forums. So you
>>>>>>>> people would probably love it there!!! You would be safe to cowardly
>>>>>>>> hide in your tiny little mental safety zone, instead of being bullied
>>>>>>>> and picked on by a very few people who challenge you to think beyond
>>>>>>>> what your horribly restricted little minds are mentally able to take
>>>>>>>> into consideration.
>>>>>> How many times does this moron need to be reminded that atheism is a
>>>>>> non-event, even strong atheism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "There's no God" is said in exactly the same vein as "no ghosts". "no
>>>>>> UFOs". "no psychics", etc.
>>>>> those are all beliefs
> A stupid lie.

"there is no (whatever)" is an assertion, a statement of belief that 
something is true. idiot!

>
> A falsifiable conclusion is  not a belief - it's the  only way to
> treat ridiculous claims.
>
> These morons can't grasp that saying "God did it" to an atheist or any
> other non-Christian is the same as Jesper insisting Krishna did it to
> Christians.

I can

>
>>>>>> And it is falsifiable - all believers have to do is provide the
>>>>>> missing evidence, which none of them have ever done so the conclusion
>>>>>> is obvious.
>>>>> you're confusing evidence with proof
> Another stupid lie.
>
>>>> No, he's not.
>>> yes he is, because he asked for the 'missing' evidence. there is already
>>> evidence for those things, so what he wants is conclusive evidence ie.
>>> evidence that will create proof
> So provide some of it,

I don't need to because I don't claim there is any

>   liar.

yes, you are!

>
> These liars have never provided anything remotely resembling evidence.
>
> They claim it exists, and when cornered they offer a standard list
> that has been debunked over and over again.

oh yes, very logical.. the evidence that doesn't exist can be debunked. 
how does that work exactly?

>
>> Sorry, but in science there is no such thing as "proof";
>> everything is subject to revision as new evidence becomes
>> available. What he's asking for is *objective*, *verifiable*
>> evidence which explains the data at least as well, and
>> preferable better, than current scientific theory. And no
>> such evidence has been presented.
> The proven serial liar knows this, because it has been pointed out
> over and over again.

see my reply to BobC. oh, that's right you can't. because you have me 
blocked. but that doesn't stop you from commenting on what I say, but 
without having to address any rebuttal. guess what that makes you.. a 
fuckwit!

>
>>> http://ausnet.info/evidence
>> Those are general definitions, not scientific ones. In the
>> same way, "theory" means something completely different, and
>> much more rigorous, in science that the general usage of
>> "reasonable guess". Try this; it may help you learn
>> something about the subject:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence
>>
>>>>    But *you* are confusing evidence with
>>>> anecdote.
> It's a theist doing what theists do.

it's an atheist doing what atheists do.. hate!

might I suggest that you stick with the abuse and insults because you 
suck at logic and reason!

Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

www.thescienceforum.com/ is a pussy forum you might love mur@. - 2015-12-14 00:52 -0500
  Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-15 03:19 +0000
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-15 10:25 -0700
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2015-12-17 00:10 +0000
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:28 -0700
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 12:22 -0600
    Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-15 11:47 -0600
      Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-17 20:24 +1100
        Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-17 10:29 -0700
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-17 11:38 -0600
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:37 +1100
          Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-18 11:32 +1100
            Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-18 11:22 -0700
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-12-18 12:55 -0600
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:50 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:01 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:24 +1100
              Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-19 11:35 +1100
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> - 2015-12-19 11:11 -0700
                Re: www.thescienceforum.com/ is a forum you might love felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-12-20 09:23 +1100

csiph-web