Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #607472
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-12-01 15:51 -0800 |
| References | <LSK%z.49713$X11.21707@fx19.am4> <c8ec67ef-f191-4055-9db6-45f9b4f26282@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <dd938ec2-7086-441c-b351-d9ca1af940f4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? |
| From | "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 3:19:36 PM UTC-8, nu...@bid.nes wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 5:17:34 PM UTC-8, JiiPee wrote: > > If I want to prove/test that a car with a speed of 400 km/hour can not > > penetrate a certain width of steel plate is this logic valid: > > Experiment trumps logic (650 mph): > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DeBJqrS680 > > Answer- No. > > > Mark L. Fergerson Battle ship very heavy steel,but we build shells to pierce it and explode inside. Way inside the better.Bombs too. Knock out tanks etc. Trebert
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 01:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:00 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 11:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:42 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 09:33 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 10:30 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 12:39 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:22 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 16:28 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 07:07 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 19:16 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:24 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 17:00 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-02 00:13 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:19 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:51 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 19:03 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:44 -0500
csiph-web