Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #59686

Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire the dress wearing goat raper, socked up as Nadegda,
in <news:nlv679$mg6$32@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again from IP address 67.70.59.199 (MD5 hash 
3eb94e9ccb87adec6bcfc39357241aba) in Deep River, ON, Canada:

Paul's stuck, he's been outed, can't change his IP address due to ISP
restrictions, so he's decided to just do mad bleating. LOL

> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 20:39:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote:

>> In article <nluuq5$mg6$29@dont-email.me>, Paul G. Derbyshire
>> the dress wearing goat raper, socked up as Nadegda,
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> says...

>>> Fakey McKookTard

Right out of the gate, the one who kicks your stupid ass the hardest
is foremost in your mind, Paul... how's it feel to know I loom over
your every thought? LOL

>>> is limited to very repetitive cut'n'paste screed and
>>> seems to have no capacity for original thought or any possibility of an
>>> exit strategy with any dignity left intact. Not that he seems to have
>>> an exit strategy, period. Then there's the usual assortment of inane
>>> burblefrothers who seem impervious to context or logic -- dolf and %
>>> for instance. All of them would seem to be extremely weak on offense.
>>> 
>>> As for defense, the thinnest skinned ones would have to be the most
>>> meltdown-prone when jabbed mildly. A list that dolf again climbs highly
>>> on, and the desperate posthumping and vigorous defensive screeds seen
>>> lately from Fakey, murphy, and "Mr. Smartypants" all point to high
>>> placement for them as well on an All-Time Thinnest Skins list. The
>>> first two of those three have a lengthy history of spectacular
>>> meltdowns to add to the evidence.
>>> 
>>> If we include past performers, there are several more kooks that score
>>> highly on both, having *thought* they were punching hard and then asked
>>> "why isn't my opponent dead yet/melting/whatever?", sometimes aloud,
>>> while also undergoing impressive breakdowns when challenged or
>>> criticized. AB and Fred Hall perhaps top *that* list. The former went
>>> on a spamming spree ranting about how evil his nemesis was, a
>>> particularly extreme type of meltdown seen previously from murphy and
>>> most recently from dolf. Morphing in rapid-fire seems to be a part and
>>> parcel of this meltdown type, as it was observed in all three cases.

Nicely bleated, Paul. You seem to be frothing more and more lately...
was it something I said? LOL

>>> As for who's unflappable and unperturbable in the face of attacks,
>>> there'd be %,

% is the only one I agree with in this entire lits o' slurp. LOL

>>> you,

Bwahahaha! You mean Chimpy, who melted down so badly he was frothing
out a new post every 6-1/2 minutes on average, 24/7 for months on end,
utterly lost his ability to do simple math or figure out chronology,
then he ran away to the Flonk, then hid out in alt.checkmate and
demanded that I address my posts only to that froup or he'd not
respond to them? The guy who had to take a months-long mental health
hiatus, only to return as "Checkmate 2.0 - the newly sane cockgobble"
and avoid me for the better part of a year? The guy who, once he
finally nutted up enough to face me again, was melting down again
inside of two days, then made noises like he was "tired of this place,
my job is done here anyway" (Chimpy's words) leaving? The guy's who's
melted down and ran away 4 times? LOL

>>> pandora,

She's not unflappable, she's just too senile to respond with much more
than "indeed". LOL

>>> kensi,

Your left-sock just runs away from any topic you get your moronic ass
kicked on, Paul. You're not "unflappable", you're a coward. Remember,
you ran away for 3 years, Paul. LOL

>>> and Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder,

Bahahaa! You mean the moron who invented entirely new ways of melting
down, including ASCII Art Made By A Retard, making moronic book covers
but not being talented enough to write the book, promising to write a
tribute song then failing badly at it, and spamming bad sinewaves
endlessly as he got caught in lie after lie and demonstrated his
mathematical mega-moronism, which only served to exacerbate his frothy
condition? LOL

>>> of whom you, kensi, and Dogwhistle show substantial capability for offense
>>> as well as defense, to judge by the SPNAKings dealt to Fakey in
>>> particular. Skeet's also got decent offense, but weaker defense, as
>>> witness his current mutual posthumping frothfest with Fakey. That one
>>> needs to learn a bit more self-restraint (and spit out the Derbyshire
>>> Kool-Ade) if he's to get off the "kooks" list and perhaps, someday,
>>> even onto the "kookologists" one.

>> A much more insightful answer than I had expected.

Translation:
"Oh, Paul... I want another hawt wet 69 with you. SLLLLUUURRRRPPP!!"

<snicker>

>> I find that "interesting," although I don't quite agree with you
>> on AB or Fred.  As for Fakeytard

The one you mention by name is the one you pheer the most. And in
Chimpy's case, he can't go a single post without bleating my nym, so I
must make him fright-shit himself continually. LOL

>> having an exit strategy, I'm afraid he's stuck in his own
>> living hell here.  To quit floundering around as he has been, would be
>> to admit defeat.  In HIS mind, of course... everyone else saw it a long
>> time ago.

> You're bang-on about Kooky McFakeTard.

Your endless bleating about your Usenet Lord and Master proves you've
had your stupid asses kicked so hard by me that you can't STFU about
the trauma you suffered, you pathetic punted bawlbabies.

And I note Chimpy's slurping Paul Derbyshire. Again. LOL

Paul, you stupid fuck, you've been outed seven times.

03 May 2016 - MID: <ng9mdq$m43$33@dont-email.me>
posting-host="28e199bc366b04f624161a7e7c6d9ee6"
67.70.57.221 Deep River, ON, Canada

10 Jun 2016 - MID: <njf6m0$9i5$13@dont-email.me>
posting-host="5a7d8d855af84388d01b7dc826ef09d4"
67.70.57.173 Deep River, ON, Canada

20 Jun 2016 - MID: <nka7gl$lnq$1@dont-email.me>
posting-host="012e03f33b086ea5f85f61609ba7b360"
67.70.98.116 Deep River, ON, Canada

01 Jul 2016 - MID: <nl6kqc$q0d$10@dont-email.me>
posting-host="58c64c3df7194056193d4316e7d6bde7"
67.70.57.43 Deep River, ON, Canada

05 Jul 2016 - MID: <nlh8q3$sgh$12@dont-email.me>
posting-host="ffc2b295bc7bc97250a857d253111bde"
67.70.57.183 Deep River, ON, Canada

09 Jul 2016 - MID: <nlrmrj$lqb$15@dont-email.me>
posting-host="3eb94e9ccb87adec6bcfc39357241aba"
67.70.59.199 Deep River, ON, Canada

And once by Ray Banana. LOL

Anyone can check that the IP addresses have MD5 hashes that match your
posting-host, and anyone can go to MaxMind GeoIP to determine that
you're a dress-wearing goat-raping shroomtard using IP addresses from
Deep River, ON, Canada, just down the road from Pembroke, ON, Canada.

You moron. LOL

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178"; logging-data="29843";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

Everyone is laughing at you, Paul Derbyshire. Everyone.

Spankard. ShroomTard. Failure.

<snicker>

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs>
Subject: The Derbyshire Saga
================================================================
[ Posted on Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:39:04 GMT ]

Ok, kids... here's the voice from the cheap seats, on the Derbyshire
Saga (tm).

Now, having read about young Paul (the short, whiny, irritating,
psychotic child that he is) having been dragged from a lab by "the
man", I can only assume that this little story occurred a) yesterday,
and b) in the Steacie building.

The coincidence of two such occurrences cropping up in the same day
"here in the trailer park" would be just too far out to contemplate.

It would seem, then, that young Paul Derbyshire is taking first year
chemistry. As an aside, I'll note that this isn't his first little
"fling" with the department. Shortly before Christmas, the undergrads
had their lab techniques exam. Paul, to whom we can add "clumsy" as
one of his many ignoble traits, couldn't perform under pressure
(begging the question...). Long story short:  He flipped... lost it
completely. Started swearing first at the proctors, then at the lab
supervisor, and lastly, after having been ejected from the lab, lashed
out at the department Chair. (Oh, yes, cursing, swearing, threatening,
the whole nine yards.)

Btw, this goes partly to the issue of "why didn't the TA in question
squash Mr. Derbyshire like a bug?". Since the repercussions could've
been significant.

In any event:  Yesterday, Paul spilled something in the lab. He
refused to clean it up. (I believe his exact words were "I am not a
human mop.". He kept asking other students to clean up his mess, and
became obstinate when pushed to take care of it himself. When he
started screaming and ranting, the lab supervisor called security on
him.

The fellow who responded is a human mountain named Al. Really nice
guy. Anyway, Paul was standing at the sink with a corrosive solution
in a flask, and refused to leave. "I'm busy, can you come back when
I'm not so busy" is the purported comment he made. Al refused to
apprehend him until the chemicals were secured, so, with security and
the lab supervisor watching, Paul returned to his bench, and continued
his experiment. This involved clamping the offending flask, at which
time Al moved in for the kill (so to speak).

Paul struggled, and managed to punch Al in the face (knocking off his
hat!). Al became... vexed, shall we say, and grabbed Paul by the neck
in a sort of headlock. (If you can imagine tiny Paul hanging, feet
kicking, whilst Al lifts him from behind with one arm around the neck
you have the proper picture.) Al then removed him from the lab, put
him on the ground, and proceeded to cuff him.

(Paul:  "what are you doing!?")

Al calls for backup at some point.

Al: "540, this is 8, I need backup for a..." etc.

Paul:  "Talking in police code doesn't make you any better than me."

Note:  All Paul comments were in a Sam Kinison-like screech at this
point.

Campus security backup arrives, as to the "real cops". They mention to
Paul that he's going "downtown" where he will be their guest for "a
long time". As he is being dragged out of the building, Paul is
screaming "What do you mean 'a long time'? I have things to do
tonight!"

Well... sorry if my prose isn't the greatest.  The story is much
better with voice-over, and particularly when you know all the people
involved. (except Paul, of course). I heard it first hand from a guy
in my lab who witnessed the whole event, btw. He does great Sam
Kinison impersonations.

I hear Paul is now the proud owner of a "No Trespass" restraining
order to keep him from the premises of Carleton University.

Semper Inquirens  (thx, Corey)
================================================================

Brian Publicover wrote:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs/lS73j-DcD04J>
================================================================
I remember in grade 8 Paul once threw a chair at my head because I
suggested that he liked girls (he used to hate females when he was
younger). This was not an isolated incident: I've seen him attack many
people. I don't think he's dangerous (unless he is holding corrosive
chemicals), but I'd hardly call these incidents "bizarre quirks."
================================================================

Awww, poor bootfucked little kooktard Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke,
Ontario, Canada has to relive his horrible past all over again... on
top of having his stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet each and
every day. LOL

And now he's been outed as a dude who likes wearing dresses. And 
raping goats. LOL!

-- 

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature =
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even
basic geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has k'lamed that magnetism
has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then
backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature
due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't
know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and
denies the existence of magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has described a
universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe
in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could
not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality. Kensi the moron is Paul
G. Derbyshire.

<snicker>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-11 07:19 +0200
  Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-11 21:24 +0000
    Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-12 06:35 +0200
      Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-13 00:30 +0000
        Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-13 21:37 +0000
          Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-14 21:04 -0700
            Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:27 +1000
          Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-15 21:22 +1000
            Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 14:24 -0700
              Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-07-15 18:28 -0400
                Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 16:29 -0700
              Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants BBB DoW #14 <r0llinThru@none.invalid> - 2016-07-17 07:28 +1000
          Re: NOMINATION Re: Why am I doomed to always have to talk to Mr. Smartypants "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-07-15 21:12 -0700

csiph-web