Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #535565

Re: Opjects That Spin At c

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Opjects That Spin At c
Date 2015-11-26 16:15 +1100
Message-ID <dbnis1FslqbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <18d4ebb1-9f9d-494c-804d-7a5241189d55@googlegroups.com> <dbkk74F626cU1@mid.individual.net> <5e8d058d-86bb-424c-bff6-255420959c2a@googlegroups.com> <dbn1adFov0vU1@mid.individual.net> <c1a94d0e-8c86-46fd-8085-f8bc629948f7@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 26/11/2015 11:41 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 4:16:17 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else
> wrote:
>> On 26/11/2015 6:33 AM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 6:20:27 PM UTC-8, Sylvia Else
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 25/11/2015 11:40 AM, HVAC wrote:
>>>>> - show quoted text - For a small gyro its spin would not be
>>>>> measured in miles.Good for Earth's spin,but not for my 4
>>>>> inch wheel gyro.Could use rps.Electric gyros go with spin at
>>>>> rpm. It is interesting what gyro spin is relating with.Mach
>>>>> told us what the pendulum relates with,and that goes for the
>>>>> gyro as well TreBert ----------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Wtf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed.
>>>>
>>>> It appears there's really no point in trying to understand
>>>> where reber is coming from because he's living in a world of
>>>> his own devising.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>> Sylvia I do live in my very own world.In reality most do.I'm not
>>> a parrot.I think in every direction.I been told I'm very clever
>>> by clever people.To understand me one has to have only an open
>>> mind.My theories a bar maid can understand in the time it takes
>>> her to serve my beer. Have a nice Thanks giving,and eat lots of
>>> MSP with you turkey TreBert.Treb says Hi
>>>
>>
>> Thing is, viable theories have to make some kind of internal sense,
>> and yours don't. The notion that something can spin at the speed of
>> light is not a theory that's capable of being tested because it's
>> meaningless.
>>
>> There are new theories, and then there's gibberish. Your spoutings
>> are the latter.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Sylvia Not all ideas,(theories) are proven.

Theories do not get proven at all.

> Look up the word theory and get the real picture.You are new and know little on my
> ldeas."gibberish" sounds like garbage.

You're attempting to express a rate of rotation (a rotational measure) 
as a function of the speed of light (a linear measure). This makes as 
much sense as expressing a quantity of bananas in bags of oranges. The 
words fit into the English structure OK, but the result is still gibberish.

Now, you could say that the instantaneous speed of the rim of a 
gyroscope is some fraction of the speed of light, and that would be 
fine, but it implies that there is a rim, and therefore a non-zero 
radius. Applying the same approach to subatomic particles requires a 
determination of their radius, which in many cases may well be precisely 
zero.

The real problem here is that you don't seem to see that there's a 
problem with your approach.

> Email and I will show you full
> pages of me in the news.Show you my fastest pictures of stopping
> light in flight. Did you go to google and look up Gazette picture oif
> Herbert Glazier? Would you like one of my paintings? I stated
> painting at 85. Sylvia I will be giving a talk at U of Irvine and
> will show the news clipping.I will be the mayor of Fullerton in
> 2016.I build sailboats that are safer than the Titanic.  At 87 I do
> stuff.I know how everything works and how to make them work better. I
> have a company is three states.Fl.Ma. and Calif. I have three
> inventions that will make me millions by 6/29/16 I have great
> grandkids and they will go to college. Something I never had a chance
> to do.  TreBert Ooops must add I did standup at Circus Circus in
> Vegas,Stayed 32 days on the house. I have done much much more but I
> don;t like to brag.
>

None of that is relevant - it almost looks like a reverse ad-hominem.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 16:13 -0800
  Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 03:48 -0800
  Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 09:16 -0800
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-19 12:47 -0500
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 13:24 -0800
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-19 14:20 -0800
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 17:17 -0800
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 20:26 -0500
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 18:47 -0800
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 03:13 -0800
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 03:12 -0800
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-19 18:32 -0800
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 14:21 -0800
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 15:40 -0800
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-21 09:02 -0500
            Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 14:15 -0500
              Re: Opjects That Spin At c dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-21 15:41 -0500
              Re: Opjects That Spin At c Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-22 15:05 -0800
  Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-20 23:53 +1100
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 06:12 -0800
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 12:39 -0500
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:44 -0800
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 14:24 -0800
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 15:39 -0800
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 16:02 -0800
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 20:46 -0500
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 12:37 -0800
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-22 15:02 -0800
            Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 15:23 -0800
              Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 19:36 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:06 -0500
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 20:39 -0500
      Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-21 19:56 +1100
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 05:01 -0500
        Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 12:59 -0800
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 16:48 -0500
          Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-22 11:42 +1100
            Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 11:55 -0800
              Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-23 11:38 +1100
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 16:23 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 16:40 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-25 13:20 +1100
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 23:37 -0500
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 05:37 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 11:33 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-26 11:16 +1100
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 16:41 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-26 16:15 +1100
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 01:48 -0500
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 13:18 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 05:49 -0800
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-28 13:30 -0500
                Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 13:07 -0800
              Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:22 -0500
  Re: Opjects That Spin At c Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2015-11-21 17:31 -0800
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:12 -0500
    Re: Opjects That Spin At c "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 11:40 -0800
  Re: Opjects That Spin At c pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2015-11-25 16:30 -0800

csiph-web