Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #714756
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-25 18:02 -0800 |
| References | (15 earlier) <06381781-b54e-4a9f-8f10-3dfe205ec967@googlegroups.com> <fd2467dc-dc4b-40ea-ad05-b7c1485951b2@googlegroups.com> <8df8331f-e7db-45d0-bb8e-ede6688ac734@googlegroups.com> <271d88ca-278b-4d4b-9d17-dc0351d5e3cf@googlegroups.com> <d2b629ee-b93b-4a7c-b0dd-5e2845e8aabc@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <db9005ba-4a68-4e32-862a-1bc24b562ec0@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition |
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:47:08 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Page22, 2-8, AP-Maxwell Equations of New Physics/ Atom-Totality-Universe/
textbook 8th ed 2017
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 05:47:08 +0000
Page22, 2-8, AP-Maxwell Equations of New Physics/ Atom-Totality-Universe/ textbook 8th ed 2017
The magnificent heights these 6 equations bring to all of science not just Physics.
So the AP Equations of EM are six
1) Magnetic primal unit law Magnetic Field B = kg /A*s^2
2) V = i*B*L New Ohm's law, law of electricity, defining the electric current and showing V dual to B
3) V' = (i*B*L)' Ampere-Maxwell law
4) (V/i*L)' = B' Faraday law
5) (V/(B*L))' = i' the new law of spin, defining why current needs to go in a closed loop
6) (V/(i*B))' = L' the new law of Coulomb force with EM gravity force
These laws compose the bulk of Physics other than the Atomic Theory-- concerned about what is matter and what is matter made up of. The EM physics and Atomic theory are the two foundations of all science, anything else is details of Atoms and EM. Atomic Physics is the material that the EM laws act upon and interact. A nice analogy is in math, where math has numbers-- Atomic theory, and the way numbers interact or act are the four operators of add, subtract, multiply, divide, so we can think of Atomic theory as numbers and EM laws as the operators on those numbers.
The Atomic theory includes the EM theory, for EM tells us the actions and interactions of atoms. In Old Physics, they kept fumbling around with Quantum Mechanics which was a collection of rules and data and principles, but all of that, of QM, belongs either in Atomic theory or EM theory. In this textbook we derive most of the QM principles from EM.
Now Maxwell actually had 8 Original Maxwell Equations, which, through the years were reduced to 4, and the modern day 4 equations are vector equations made by Heaviside. Maxwell had Old Ohm's law in one of his 8 equations. But sadly, Maxwell did not make Ohm's law as a starting axiom or principle to derive all the other laws. Instead, Maxwell used models "the molecular vortices model" to formulate his Equations. Here, all I do is make New Ohm's law primal axiom and derive other laws by differentiation on the permutations of New Ohm's law, as was seen above.
----Ampere-Maxwell law----
Now differentiating
V' = (i*B*L)'
Using the Product Rule of Calculus. Which is (fgh)' = f'gh + fg'h + fgh'
V' = i'*B*L + i*B'*L + i*B*L'
= i*B*L + i*V/m^2*L + i*B*spin energy
= i*B*L + i^2 + i*B*spin energy
Justification:: Applying these experimental results::
(i) The derivative of voltage is current A or i.
"To put this relationship between voltage and current in a capacitor in calculus terms, the current through a capacitor is the derivative of the voltage across the capacitor with respect to time. Or, stated in more simple terms, a capacitor's current is directly proportional to how quickly the voltage across it is changing." (web)
(ii) The derivative of charge is current.
"The momentary current is given by the derivative of the electric charge by time. i(t) is the momentary current i at time t in amps (A). Q(t) is the momentary electric charge in coulombs (C). deltaQ is the electric charge in coulombs (C), that flows at time duration of delta t. " (web)
(iii) The derivative of current is current, rate of change of the current.
(iv) The derivative of magnetic field B is V/m^2. This makes B as proportional to 1/s^2 go to 1/s^3, to go from B looking to more like V. So you turn B into a quasi state V
(v) The derivative of momentum is force, and angular momentum m^2/s is force to energy m^2/s^2.
Now the above result of V' = 2 i_accel * R_ordered, which is basically V' = 2iR is Ampere-Maxwell law where a current in, yields two overall currents.
-----Faraday law-----
More differentiating
(V/(i*L))' = B'
Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/ (gh)^2
(V/i*L)' = (V'*i*L - V*i' *L - V*i*L') / (i*L)^2
= (i^2L - ViL -Vi spin)/ i^2L^2
Now applying the rules again::
(i) The derivative of voltage is current A or i.
(ii) The derivative of charge is current.
(iii) The derivative of current is accelerated current, call it i_accel
(iv) The derivative of Resistance R is more ordered more patterned resistance, let me call it R_ordered.
We have (V'R - VR') / R^2 =( iR - VR_ordered ) / R^2
Since V= iR we have (iR - iR^2_ordered)/ R^2
This ends up as (i - iR_ordered)/R
So that can be written as this, (i + i (-R_ordered)) / R where you have a direction of motion of R_ordered
This of course is the Faraday law with Lenz law as -R_ordered
Spin Law
(V/(B*L))' = i'
Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/ (gh)^2
(V/B*L)' = (V'*B*L - V*B' *L - V*B*L') / (B*L)^2
i' = (iBL -V(V/m^2)L - VBspin / B^2L^2
Having applied the rules again::
(i) The derivative of voltage is current A or i.
(ii) The derivative of charge is current.
(iii) The derivative of current is accelerated current, call it i_accel
(iv) The derivative of Resistance R is more ordered more patterned resistance, let me call it R_ordered.
i' = - (ii*L)
This is another new law Maxwell never saw. It gives rise to all spin terms in physics, from the particle spin, photon, neutrino, proton, electron, atoms, on up to planet spin, star spin and galaxy spin. It is what caused Hitomi spacecraft and later Juno spacecraft to go erratic.
Coulomb's law with EM-gravity law
More differentiating
(V/(i*B))' = L'
Using the Quotient Rule, which is (f/gh)' = (f'gh - fg'h - fgh')/ (gh)^2
(V/i*B)' = (V'*i*B - V*i' B - V*i*B') / (i*B)^2
Having applied the rules again::
(i) The derivative of voltage is current A or i.
(ii) The derivative of charge is current.
(iii) The derivative of current is accelerated current, call it i_accel
(iv) The derivative of Resistance R is more ordered more patterned resistance, let me call it R_ordered.
So far we have R' = (ii - Vi_accelerated )/ i^2
(V/(i*B))' = (V'*i*B - V*i' B - V*i*B') / (i*B)^2
L' = (i^2B - B^3- V^2i) / i^2B^2
L' = (i^2B - B^3- V^2i) / i^2B^2
This is a law that Maxwell had never seen, for it is EM-Gravity law.
It has the form of (kAA + jBB + hCC)/d^2 for an ellipse for planets to orbit the Sun, and it has so much more. And what it does is create a track in astronomy for stars or planets or moons to orbit, and not only tracks, but the planet pushes the moons in their track and the Sun pushes the planets in their tracks, call it an i current type of a push in the track. So gravity is seen not only as a gravitational attraction or pull, but also as a push in a track. So the law creates EM tracks and pushes the mass in the track to orbit. Now that makes a lot of sense, does it not for we can easily picture the Sun as a electric generator pushing monopoles (planets) to flow around in circles as a electric current.
Now, what this new law says is quite astounding for it is the motion law and why gravity is EM and why gravity has a range of motion varying from R to 1/R to 1/R^2, where R is radius.
So instead of .5 MeV monopoles flowing in wire or coil as electricity, here we have stars flowing around galaxies, and planets flowing around Sun. The law of the derivative of Resistance (B*L) is that Space is Magnetic Field, lines of force forming TRACKS in Space and the planets and stars follow along those tracks, just as monopoles follow along the copper wire. But not only follow in these tracks, but given a force of pushing the planets along in those tracks.
Finally the L' looks like the force of gravity as (kAA+jBB)/d^2 and is the copper wire in Faraday, Ampere laws. The L' equation is a new one, which Maxwell totally missed. Maxwell had nothing for the copper wires in Ampere and Faraday laws. It is a nasty habit of most scientists, that they leave things out, figuring they were not "science in general". Thinking that generalization is what science is all about, and forget the specifics.
Now if I include New Ohm's law itself along with the four differential equations, and the Magnetic field law, I believe I have captured all the laws of EM theory. So confident am I in capturing all the laws of EM theory, that I suspect Dirac Equation is set to be revised and derived from these 6 equations of EM.
Looking back, of course the idea that the electron was such a tiny puny little particle of .5MeV whilst the neutron was 945 MeV, was very much silly. Silly in not doing chemical bonding and silly in thinking electrons were moving in electricity. An electron= muon can exist with charge, moving in a circular motion. If neutral charge, it moves linearly, linear momentum.
So in the AP Equations of EM, the law of electricity and magnetism are contained in the New Ohm's law. Then, the Ampere-Maxwell, Faraday, and spin laws and the Coulomb-EM-gravity law come out of the differentiation of New Ohm's law.
And we see that three of the four laws of EM are of the math form of (kAA + jBB)/d^2 for the reason that it is quotient rule of differential calculus. Looks like I got exactly what I wanted of (kAA+jBB)/d^2 and more.
And, already, I have a question, puzzling me. For the equations above for EM theory involve equations of terms that are forces themselves. Voltage is a force even a power, and in a sense, resistance is a force-- like Lenz's law and in a sense current can be seen as monopoles in motion as a force, the monopoles pushing or pulling other monopoles.
So are the Equations of EM supposed to be forces as terms, where we multiply forces, add subtract forces, divide by forces. I can picture adding several forces, but here we multiply forces. So is this the first time in physics that we have forces as the terms in the laws. Usually the laws are terms that build up to being a force, but here we have multiplication and division of forces. Later in this book I discuss how the important equation of Chemistry, the ideal gas law PV = nRT is a form of New Ohm's law, only for chemistry. So that the Ideal Gas Law of Chemistry was a harbinger of what the true EM laws must turn out to be.
Alright I am content the above is true, and where V = i*B*L is the Law of Electricity, basically a current flow. A electric current is a flow of magnetic monopoles, those .5 MeV particles that are photons or neutrinos dressed up with a charge.
So where is Coulomb's law now located? I believe it is under the new law of L' = (V/(i*B))'. This makes sense in that Coulomb and gravity laws are the same, indistinguishable, and that they both vary from R to 1/R to 1/R^2.
In Old Physics, they had a mistaken argument that Coulomb's law was under Gauss's law of electricity. And a silly argument that they used the Gauss math of vector fields with a inverse square that they assumed what it was they were suppose to prove. In Logic, it is a boo-boo, a big no-no, to assume what it is you are demanded to prove. We have a beautiful example of that error in mathematics where the Ancient Greek Apollonius discovered conic sections and he thought, wrongly that the ellipse was a conic section when in truth it was a Oval. And this mistake lasted for thousands of years, and then along comes a Belgian named Dandelin in 1822, who assumed the section was a ellipse, not paying any attention for the validity of that assumption. So when you assume something true when it is really false, you easily can prove anything. Here in New Physics, we outright say this new law is the Coulomb law.
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
. \ . . | . /.
. . \. . .|. . /. .
..\....|.../...
::\:::|::/::
--------------- -------------
--------------- (Y) -------------
--------------- --------------
::/:::|::\::
../....|...\...
. . /. . .|. . \. .
. / . . | . \ .
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
Comment: Alright, excellent, I have found what this .5 MeV particle is, and how electricity and electric current work, what they are and how they work. It is a huge relief to me, to finally be able to view and understand how in Faraday's law, by thrusting a bar magnet through closed loop of wire produces electricity. It is because the Lines of Force in magnetism are monopoles of closed loops and when we thrust, those monopoles jump onto the wire and flow as electricity in the wire. It was never about electrons moving, but rather, about monopoles as closed loops moving.
As I said earlier, this discovery causes vast sweeping changes in Chemistry, Physics, and Biology. Some of the minor issues that have to be severely revised are (1) metallic bond (2) lightening as a phenomenon (3) theory of electricity (4) nerves in biology (5) how the brain works (6) Plate tectonics in geology, etc etc
AP
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 17:05 -0700
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:53 -0700
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:51 -0700
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 21:03 -0700
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 21:05 -0700
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 18:02 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 11:28 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:48 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:14 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 12:14 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 13:36 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 11:36 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 19:24 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 04:09 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:53 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 13:17 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 12:17 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 17:36 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 13:51 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 18:31 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 18:02 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 13:50 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:15 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 12:52 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:20 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-02 14:27 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-03 17:19 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Front Page Hog" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 05:06 +0000
Re: Archimedes "batshit crazy" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-04 05:15 +0000
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-07 13:55 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-07 21:45 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-10 18:51 -0800
Re: in 9th edition include Starpower is not fusion, but rather Faraday Law// The PLUTONIUM ATOM TOTALITY UNIVERSE textbook by Archimedes Plutonium, 2017, 8th edition Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 14:02 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-12-13 03:20 +0000
csiph-web