Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #48639
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <nfg22e$10g5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <089ec2538a6d98ee9a650e9f29dcddf1@dizum.com> <nflf94$uqg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4914e4dba202268213e1d2c25126b0d3@dizum.com> <nfo4di$13uv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| Subject | Re: What a line of bullshit |
| Message-ID | <db379cdc9e7064f10b5248c5c83009c4@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-04-27 06:47 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
Paul G. Derbyshire, socked up as Ko0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard,
in <news:nfo4di$13uv$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:
> On 26/04/2016 1:18 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:
>> Except it does. I note you're not providing any proof of your moronic
>> contention that an older article somehow trumps several newer studies
>> *and* newer, unaltered data. LOL
> An older article in a peer reviewed journal certainly trumps several
> newer "studies" that only appear on a climate denier ko0kbl0g and newer,
> "unaltered" (= raw, unfiltered, uncalibrated) data.
You mean all those website references you yet again cowardly snipped
out? LOL
You mean the altered data that NOAA adjusted upward to match the ship
intake temperatures (said ship intakes adding 0.12 C to the water
temperature), rather than adjusting it downward to match the
more-calibrated buoys, then refused to explain why, even when
subpoenaed? LOL
Whoopsie... NOAA released a report stating that they were at a loss to
explain why the entire Atlantic ocean was *cooling*:
<http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/the-entire-atlantic-ocean-is-cooling-contrary-to-media-reports.html>
Does... does that Climate Katastrophe Kook author *admit* the Southern
Ocean is *cooling*, while still trying to toe the "zOMG!
Anfripumoodrick Gloebeel Waoerming! DDUUUURRRHH!" line? LOL
<http://oceans.mit.edu/news/featured-stories/southern-ocean-cooling-in-a-warming-world>
"persistent cooling in the Southern Ocean and sea ice expansion"
Whoopsie again... do those peer-reviewed papers state that the Pacific
ocean *cooled*? Gee... that giant El Nino wasn't so much a heat
buildup as it was a cooling of the rest of the ocean. LOL
<http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/151113/ncomms9854/full/ncomms9854.html?WT.ec_id=NCOMMS-20151118&spMailingID=50043462&spUserID=ODkwMTM2NjQyNgS2&spJobID=802458284&spReportId=ODAyNDU4Mjg0S0>
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL064456/full>
Huh... NODC/NOAA's own data shows the cooling, too:
<https://bobtisdale.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/figure-5.png?w=720>
Hey, the eastern Bering Sea cooled recently, as well:
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967063714001903>
Huh... the South China Sea is cooling, too:
<http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967063715001454>
Gee... seems like the only place that's been warming is the Indian
Ocean. Or not:
<http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015EGUGA..17.7167U>
"Assessment of Indian Ocean heat content since the 1950s suggests
extensive (subsurface) cooling for much of the tropical Indian Ocean."
Perhaps because you're a Klimate Katastrophe Kook, you don't realize
that the planet is temperature-stable and has been for millions upon
millions of years... if it were not so, it would have gone into
temperature runaway mode long ago.
<https://stream.org/new-ocean-cooling-process-implies-climate-stable-knew/>
> (Bob Tisdale exposed:
> https://tamino.wordpress.com/2015/07/20/fundamental-differences-between-bob-tisdale-and-reality/)
>> wattsupwiththat<SMACKAKo0K!>
>> bobtisdale<SMACKAK0OK!>
>> bobtisdale<SMACKAKO0K!>
>> bobtisdale<SMACKAK00K!>
>> bobtisdale<SMACKAK0oK!>
Awww, you snipped out the NASA JPL data, too, Paul... why is that?
======================================================
<http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2014/06oct_abyss/>
<http://iceagenow.info/2014/10/nasa-stumped-deep-oceans-warmed-2005/>
"When scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, California, analyzed satellite and direct ocean temperature
data from 2005 to 2013, they found that "the ocean abyss below 1.24
miles (1,995 meters) has not warmed measurably", the space agency
announced in a press release on Monday.
Whoopsie... does... does that say that NASA JPL proved there's no
warming below 2000 meters?
======================================================
Oh, that's why... because you k'lame all that "zOMG! Anthripoomurphy
Globail Waoerming! DUUURRRRHH!" is hiding deep in the ocean, and NASA
JPL proves you wrong. LOL
And you snipped out all that NOAA data that was de-altered to show the
lie that NOAA is trying to foist onto the public.
Whoopsie... does that CMC Environmental Canada graphic show cooler
than normal SST anomalies along the equatorial Pacific, indicating
that a La Nina is building? IOW, the cooling as the El Nino rains out
is accelerating. Maybe that's why both BOM and NOAA have issued La
Nina advisories. LOL
<https://weather.gc.ca/data/saisons/images/2016042200_054_G6_global_I_SEASON_tm@lg@sd_000.png>
SPNAK!
> Denialist ko0ksites.
You're bleating out your Chicken Little Klimate Katastrophe Kook
blather about 0.065 C over 45 years, Paul. And that's using the
altered data from NOAA... the very *best* they could come up with was
a 0.065 C increase from 0 to 2000 meters, which equates to a 0.2 C /
century increase in the 0 to 700 meter ocean layer. That gives a
forcing of less than 0.5 W/m^2, which, if you'll remember, I've
already calculated the time necessary to increase ocean temperature by
1 C for a forcing of the currently claimed level of 0.6 W/m^2.
Message-ID: <e9452ea7326398be36fdb9e6c7adb028@dizum.com>
========================================================
Except... what's the latest claimed energy imbalance of the planet,
LunkHead? Oh, it's 0.6 +- 0.17 W/m^2, or a maximum total of
2.6817566e+18 Joules / year.
5.8597e24 J/K / 2.6817566e+18 Joules / year? Why, that's 2,185,023
years at the currently claimed radiative imbalance of the planet just
to raise the ocean temperature by 1 C... and that's if *all* of that
energy is retained, with none of it being re-radiated out to space.
========================================================
<http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/09/ocean-heat-content-relentless-but.html>
SPNAK!
>> NOAA hands over some e-mails for Congressman's subpoena
> Ah, so not a normal subpoena from a real lawyer in a real legal dispute
> after all. Just some political fishing expedition by a bunch of
> Republican congresscritters wielding *Congressional* subpoenas at the
> whims of their oil-company paymasters. As I thought.
Awww, being Canuckistanian, Paul Derbyshire didn't know that the
constitutionally-mandated Congressional subpoena trumps the courts
unless there's a blatant violation of a citizen's rights by Congress.
A Congressional subpoena is the highest form of subpoena there is. LOL
<https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/ec1203b2-a787-44ac-8344-5d5fab374ffa/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/11509b8b-df81-4db6-9e89-1d1b16c20856/White-Paper-Congressional-Subpoena.pdf>
==========================================================
Most Americans understand that the United States Congress is
constitutionally vested with the power to make laws. What is often
less well understood - but may be just as important to those who are
subject to its jurisdiction - is Congress's power to investigate
matters through the issuance of subpoenas and other compulsory
processes.
The Scope of Congress's Subpoena Power
Congress has long been held to possess plenary authority to
investigate any matter that is or might be the subject of legislation
or oversight. And as the Supreme Court observed over 35 years ago,
this authority includes the power to use compulsory processes, such as
the issuance of subpoenas. See Eastland v. U.S. Serviceman's Fund, 421
U.S. 491, 504 (1975). The scope of Congress's power "is as penetrating
and far-reaching as the potential power to enact and appropriate under
the Constitution." Id. at 504 n.15 (quoting Barenblatt v. U.S., 360
U.S. 109, 111 (1959)). Put another way, although Congress ought not to
delve needlessly into the "private affairs" of the citizenry, it has
the power to inquire about and investigate any issue "on which
legislation could be had". Id. (quoting McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S.
135, 177 (1927)). So long as Congress stays within this "necessarily
broad" grant of constitutional authority, courts have little power to
restrain its action. See Id. at 508 ("The wisdom of congressional
approach or methodology is not open to judicial veto."). As a
practical matter, this means that courts generally will not interfere
with a congressional subpoena absent a truly opprobrious violation of
an individual's constitutional rights
==========================================================
SPNAK!
>> Information provided to the Committee by whistleblowers
> aka paid denialist flacks.
Wrong. NOAA employees. "The global warming study was rushed to
publication over the objections of numerous scientists at the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration."
<http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/19/whistleblowers-claim-noaa-rushed-contentious-pause-buster-study-despite-reservations/>
Why is NOAA hiding the evidence of this supposed "no global warming
pause", Paul? If they were so sure of their data, they'd have released
it and the explanations as to why they adjusted highly-calibrated buoy
data upward to match the less-highly calibrated ship intake
temperature (said shipboard machinery adding 0.12 C to the temperature
of the sea water), rather than adjusting ship intake temperature down
to match the buoys. Right? No subpoena needed, no obfuscation, no
backpedaling on NOAA's part... if what they did was on the up-and-up,
they'd have released that data right away. But they didn't, Paul.
Of course, this isn't the first time NOAA has tried this tactic...
they k'lamed the "global warming" pause was a result of all that heat
hiding in the oceans prior to the year 2000, too. And they got proven
wrong. LOL
<http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/ocean.html>
SPNAK!
> Funny how every one of your climate denialist screeds turns to smoke
> upon closer inspection, isn't it, ko0ky?
Funny how you cowardly snipped them all out because you can't refute
them... especially the NASA JPL study. LOL
> *sn<SMACKAMORON!>
SPNAK!
Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!
Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>
X-Received: by 10.224.215.194 with SMTP id
hf2mr20447108qab.0.1367629316993;
Fri, 03 May 2013 18:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path:
y6ni5923qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED.67.70.58.178!not-for-mail
From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this
Usenet thing?
Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
References: <klmos0$ma7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
<klpdue$ij8$1@news.albasani.net> <p6cgt.2690$hl7.1582@newsfe14.iad>
<klsfqm$vnt$5@dont-email.me> <klskpp$uv9$1@dont-email.me>
<x4ogt.36755$zt4.25500@newsfe15.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178";
logging-data="29843";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 5876
Lines: 116
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
========================================================
========================================================
Adding the Injection-Info: header into an E-S post gets it rejected.
Go on, Paul, do it again, if you claim to be able to do it at will.
Make it exactly this:
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="1.1.1.1";
logging-data="29843";
Well, Paul? We're waiting. <tap, tap, tap> Nothing, Paul?
<snicker>
Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>
Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.
And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.
Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!
Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>
She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.
Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.
<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>
You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>
> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited
> any good telescopes lately?
Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?
<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================
--
Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================
Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.
Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176
Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.
The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.
Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.
You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================
But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.
Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".
In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.
He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.
Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.
Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".
Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.
Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.
Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.
Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.
Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.
The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.
Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.
Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.
That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Legitimacy? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:12 +0200
Re: Legitimacy? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-17 06:57 -0400
Re: Legitimacy? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-18 07:24 +0200
Re: Legitimacy? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-18 06:09 -0400
Re: Legitimacy? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-19 07:44 +0200
Re: Legitimacy? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-19 14:12 +0000
Re: Legitimacy? Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-19 14:41 -0700
Re: Legitimacy? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Legitimacy? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-20 06:43 +0200
Re: Legitimacy? Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-19 23:33 -0700
Re: Legitimacy? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-20 09:51 -0400
What a line of bullshit Paul Derbyshire <GregHall@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-20 08:46 -0600
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-21 07:28 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-21 19:24 +0000
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-22 07:03 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-22 09:11 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-23 08:54 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-23 03:12 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-24 08:03 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-23 23:39 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-24 02:51 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-24 02:24 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-25 07:52 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-25 00:13 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-25 05:07 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-25 13:55 -0700
Re: What a line of bullshit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 00:31 +0000
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 06:10 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-25 23:28 -0600
Re: What a line of bullshit Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-25 01:25 -0600
Re: What a line of bullshit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-25 10:26 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-23 10:49 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-24 06:33 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 12:05 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-26 07:18 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 12:18 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 21:19 +0000
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-27 06:47 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-27 12:38 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-28 08:02 +0200
IRONIC? Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-28 01:22 -0600
Re: IRONIC? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-28 03:28 -0700
Re: IRONIC? TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-04-28 20:30 +1000
Re: IRONIC? Skeet DoW #8 <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-28 08:51 -0600
Re: IRONIC? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-28 18:01 +0000
Re: What a line of bullshit Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2016-04-27 01:45 +0800
Re: What a line of bullshit Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-27 01:50 +0800
Re: What a line of bullshit kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-26 13:50 -0400
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-27 07:53 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2016-04-28 17:54 +0800
Re: What a line of bullshit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-29 07:26 +0200
Re: What a line of bullshit Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-21 19:21 +0000
Re: Legitimacy? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 17:07 +0000
Re: Legitimacy? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-20 18:13 +0100
Re: Legitimacy? g8dgc <g8dgc@noneya.none> - 2016-04-20 13:45 -0400
Re: Legitimacy? wod@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Wader of Doom) - 2016-04-20 18:53 +0100
Re: Legitimacy? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-21 07:58 +0200
csiph-web