Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #271132
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO |
| Date | 2015-11-17 05:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <davo6sFr042U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <EPqdneQ_GdzR09TLnZ2dnUU7-a-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net> <Ye6dneXg_vagKNTLnZ2dnUU7-UWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Am 16.11.2015 11:50, schrieb Rocky: > "Thomas Heger"<ttt_heg@web.de> wrote in message > news:datdm4F8gfoU1@mid.individual.net... >> Am 16.11.2015 04:31, schrieb Rocky: >>> Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO >>> https://911justicehalifax.wordpress.com/nuclear-devices-used-at-wtc/ >>> >> I just have found the website of Dimitri Khalezov: >> >> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center-damage-to-bathtub/ >> >> Quote: >> "The most spiteful of these critics were supposed "followers of Judy Wood's >> theory" - the so-called conspiracy theory No.5 (or "DEW" theory) which we >> have already disproved in the corresponding Chapter of this book. >> Actually, these folks from "Judy Wood creed" bear striking similarities to >> a typical cult, but in reality it seems they are just a well-organized >> group of shills who pretend to behave as if it were a indeed a "cult". >> These folks attempted to "debunk" my "theory" (thus, clearly ignoring my >> statement that I am not a "theorist" but a "witness" and therefore my >> supposed "theory" is not actually a "theory" and therefore can not be >> treated as such) by claiming that I allegedly could not explain why "my" >> "alleged" "underground nuclear explosions" did not damage the so-called >> "bathtub" and why they did not damage PATH (the underground train system). >> >> These shills from the little army headed by Judy Wood pretended not to >> notice the definition of "ground zero" in pre-9/11 English language, they >> preferred not to notice high temperatures that unexplainably persisted >> underground for almost 4 months, and they preferred not to notice leukemia >> and other radiation-related cancers strangely endemic among the ground >> zero responders. >> >> They continue to stubbornly insist that the WTC was demolished by >> mysterious "laser beams from space", which, in their opinions, should >> successfully explain both - "dustifications" of the Towers and the >> underground fires (along with "ground zero" name). Moreover, they claim >> that I was allegedly hired by the U.S. Government to "dissolve" their >> alleged "truth" (supposedly provided by Judy Wood) with a certain >> "plausible lie" - because, they claimed, I could not satisfactorily >> explain why "my" underground nukes did not damage the "bathtub" and PATH >> trains and stations." >> >> As I feel kind of personally addressed, I would like to say: >> >> - I personally think, that Judy Woods assumptions are correct >> >> - I have or had no contact whatsoever to her by any kind of means. >> >> So, I reject the claim, she has followers, that act like a cult. >> >> Actually I had physics as kind of hobby and found something fitting. So I >> heard of Tom Bearden and John Hutchison long ago, but not in connection to >> 9/11. >> >> I reject the idea of explosion by any kind of bomb, because of the missing >> material and the restriction of the demolition to the area above the >> surface level. > > The missing material was just material vaporized to ultra fine and once the > material was that small it floated away in tremendous clouds of debris. And > nukes can do that but more specifically MRR nukes can do that and leave less > of a trail then American made nukes would leave. "Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever ! " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4FkO5ry1uo Quote. "Building 6 was a 1/2 million sq ft building with its core missing on september 11th 2001 , the interior of the building is missing , it was not crushed or on fire ,no nano thermite , no mini nukes , or explosions the walls are intact the basement is intact the only thing that stands out is cardboard and wires have little to no damage ." So: we have NO explosion, but an *implosion*. This is actually different and what see are remains from matter, which simply manage to get missing. It is like 'being sucked into a black hole'. This pattern of destruction we see at all the buildings. TH
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-15 21:31 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-16 08:07 +0100
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 04:50 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 10:01 -0800
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 14:10 -0800
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 17:02 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-16 20:48 -0500
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:46 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:27 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-11-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:38 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 02:00 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 07:36 -0800
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 04:12 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 08:38 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-20 18:22 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 15:43 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-21 09:53 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 05:19 +0100
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 09:26 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 07:45 -0800
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-17 21:17 +0100
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-17 15:20 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-11-21 06:11 +0100
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-16 15:10 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 09:35 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-17 16:42 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-20 16:41 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-21 02:49 +0000
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-16 11:52 -0800
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-11-16 14:09 -0600
Re: Nuclear Devices Used at WTC GROUND ZERO naazim palan <naazimpalan@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 04:28 -0800
csiph-web