Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #154544
| From | Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Computer Products United |
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dattl1F45c2U15@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <93aafdef-8e0a-42d7-8bbe-a78e75ee6129@googlegroups.com> <dat7r5F45c2U14@mid.individual.net> <datno2FavrfU1@mid.individual.net> |
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:59:31 +0000, Huge wrote: > On 2015-11-16, Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 20:54:28 -0800, chriskeegan2014 wrote: >> >>> I have an ad clipped from some magazine kicking around somewhere. This >>> company in Anaheim, CA iirc made, to my knowledge, the world's only >>> 80186 based IBM Compatible motherboard. The only thing that comes >>> anywhere near, again to my knowledge, is the V40 based Ampro >>> LittleBoard/PC. The earlier 80186 Ampro was not compatible. >>> Anyway if you know about this company, worked for this company, or >>> just have any of it's older products kicking around collecting dust, >>> please chime in. >> >> 'Compatible' in a very loose sense, I guess. Compatible at the BIOS >> level, but not at the hardware level, since the 80186 had marked >> differences in the way it handled certain operations such as >> interrupts. > > Was not the Amstrad PC an 80186? And I know the PC add-in board for the > Xerox 6085 was. That made sense, as it was a lower chip count. And the Anstrad PC wasn't fully compatible. -- Using UNIX since v6 (1975)... Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Computer Products United chriskeegan2014@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 20:54 -0800
Re: Computer Products United Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-16 05:28 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-16 09:59 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Bob Eager <news0005@eager.cx> - 2015-11-16 11:40 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-16 11:35 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2015-11-16 11:23 -0600
Re: Computer Products United scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-11-16 17:27 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-11-16 18:27 +0000
Re: Computer Products United cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2015-11-16 21:48 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Freddy1 <something@something.com> - 2015-11-16 17:38 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2015-11-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Computer Products United Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2015-12-07 21:26 +0100
Re: Computer Products United Daiyu Hurst <daiyu.hurst@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 12:29 -0800
Re: Computer Products United chriskeegan2014@gmail.com - 2015-12-02 11:31 -0800
Re: Computer Products United chriskeegan2014@gmail.com - 2015-12-02 11:34 -0800
Re: Computer Products United Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-12-04 00:00 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2015-12-04 20:56 +0000
Re: Computer Products United Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-12-04 17:12 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-12-02 18:44 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Daiyu Hurst <daiyu.hurst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 17:29 -0800
Re: Computer Products United Daiyu Hurst <daiyu.hurst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-05 17:29 -0800
Re: Computer Products United "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 08:27 -0500
Re: Computer Products United "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 17:02 +1100
Re: Computer Products United Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2015-11-16 11:36 -0500
Re: Computer Products United Daiyu Hurst <daiyu.hurst@gmail.com> - 2015-11-27 12:28 -0800
csiph-web