Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds

From	dvus <dven1@adelphia.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds
Date	2015-11-07 21:43 -0500
Message-ID	<da7r5qFnthlU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <n1gi77$h14$1@dont-email.me> <da4783Fqkc5U1@mid.individual.net> <n1jdpe$da0$2@dont-email.me> <da68h9FbgtsU1@mid.individual.net> <n1l0f5$pmn$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/7/2015 9:07 AM, Poutnik wrote:
> Dne 07/11/2015 v 13:18 dvus napsal(a):
>> On 11/6/2015 6:42 PM, Poutnik wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2015 06:44 PM, dvus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So the statement "Yellowstone is ready to blow" is sort of meaningless.
>>>> Is anything that might happen between now and a few hundred thousand
>>>> years from now "ready" to happen in your estimation?
>>>
>>> It depends on what you consider by being ready.
>>
>> Which is exactly why I asked what you meant by "ready". You are, after
>> all, the one who used that term in your remarks.
>>
>> Just wondering is all, should I move to Alaska in the next month or year?
>>
>
> I am not the one who used it, I just responded.
>
> A gun is ready to fire a bullet,
> if loaded by ammo, primed, and protection is OFF.
>
> But when or even if it happens is unclear.
> Being ready to event says nothing about when or if event happen.

Yes, I apologize, it was "reber g=emc^2" (or Trebert, depending) who 
made the statement that Yellowstone was "ready" to blow. At the time I 
thought it a silly statement in talking about Supervolcanoes.

-- 
dvus

Thread

Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 17:59 -0600
  Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-04 20:44 -0600
    Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 19:05 -0800
      Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 09:37 -0800
        Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-05 14:38 -0500
          Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:39 +0100
            estudent noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 19:47 -0800
              Re: estudent "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 15:05 -0800
                Re: estudent jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-07 00:55 +0000
              Re: estudent noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 07:49 -0800
            Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2015-11-06 15:28 +0000
              Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 00:40 +0100
            Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-06 12:44 -0500
              Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 00:42 +0100
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-07 07:18 -0500
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 15:07 +0100
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-07 21:43 -0500
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 07:50 +0100
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-09 07:35 -0500
                Re: Supervolcanoes likely triggered externally, study finds Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:06 +0100

csiph-web