Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #368543
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work |
| Date | 2015-10-30 23:06 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <d9h4qtFkasU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <cc0f9f93-148e-4ad1-99be-16b7bacbd3ca@googlegroups.com> |
On 30/10/2015 10:54 PM, mlwozniak@wp.pl wrote: > W dniu piątek, 30 października 2015 12:08:24 UTC+1 użytkownik paparios napisał: >> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 9:57:57 PM UTC-3, kefischer wrote: >>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT), pnalsing@gmail.com wrote: >> >>>> >>>> What is extraordinary is that the orbital calculations >>>> show that the mass of the unseen object that all of >>>> these stars are orbiting has a mass of 4.3 million suns! >>> >>> I would like to see a technical paper on >>> the matter before thinking about it. >>> >> >> http://www2011.mpe.mpg.de/ir/GC/papers/nature2002.pdf > > So, we have a theory. It's saying "a huge mass > will be invisible". > And we have a huge mass - visible. > What a perfect experimental evidence of the theory!!! > There is a huge mass!!!!!! And, as all huge masses > are invisible, it's obviously invisible!!!! So it > confirms the theory!!!! > What? it's visible? Doesn't matter, we can explain > it!!!! There must be an explaination!!! What matters, > it's that it's obviously invisible, as all huge masses > are invisible, so it confirms the theory!!!! > > That comment appears to relate to something else. Certainly, it doesn't relate to the cited paper. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-30 04:54 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-10-30 23:06 +1100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-30 05:20 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-30 09:08 -0400
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-30 06:38 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-30 11:54 -0400
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 10:59 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-30 14:13 -0400
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 11:31 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-11-07 12:43 +1100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-06 21:05 -0500
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-06 18:48 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-06 23:10 -0500
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-06 20:35 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-07 01:06 -0500
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-06 22:27 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-07 02:02 -0500
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-11-07 12:37 +0000
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-07 16:44 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-07 09:24 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-07 18:57 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-07 10:21 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-07 20:41 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 20:23 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-08 08:34 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 00:08 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-08 14:08 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 05:24 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-30 05:47 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 11:05 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-30 19:47 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-30 12:53 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:03 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:13 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-30 18:23 -0400
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:29 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-10-30 19:31 -0400
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work ktalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 19:29 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:26 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2015-10-30 06:34 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-10-30 06:42 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-30 15:47 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-30 17:06 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-30 17:40 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-30 17:55 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-10-30 18:40 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 12:56 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-30 21:14 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:04 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-10-30 23:35 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 16:03 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-02 01:17 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:10 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-03 01:13 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-03 04:50 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 23:08 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-03 14:37 -0800
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 15:28 -0700
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 23:43 +0100
Re: How doess "experimental evidence" work fuller.david@hotmail.com - 2015-11-03 04:47 -0800
csiph-web