Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? |
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:39 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <d9cq3vFqoecU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <91e0bf18-9466-4b45-8b18-4e93995ea55b@googlegroups.com> <d9bbdoFg1b3U2@mid.individual.net> <f9617dbc-80d9-459d-80c9-5af6050512dc@googlegroups.com> <d9bdukFg1b3U4@mid.individual.net> <n0rb1h$4mj$1@dont-email.me> |
James Kuyper wrote: > On 10/28/2015 04:05 AM, Ian Collins wrote: >> asetofsymbols@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Where's the context? >> >>> I don't know the documentation, >> >> Then check your man pages or whatever passes for man pages if you are >> stuck on windows. > > Up until C2011, the standard didn't say anything about threads; the only > place to get relevant information was the documentation for the > particular implementation of the C standard library that you were using. Which was why I said "check your man pages". At least in the Unix (like) world, there will be more than one allocator available. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is malloc free sys thread safe? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-10-28 00:12 -0700
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-28 20:22 +1300
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-10-28 00:33 -0700
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-28 21:05 +1300
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-28 16:28 -0400
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-29 09:39 +1300
Re: is malloc free sys thread safe? asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-10-28 01:22 -0700
csiph-web